http://informedconsent.typepad.com/informed_consent/2007/03/another_ess_let.htmlAn interesting factoid about the Sarasota fiasco, found at the link aboveFirst, here's the list from the ES&S letter:
* No statements about possible "vulnerabilities"
* No statements about the "style" of the source code
* No statements commenting on the use of less desirable techniques, instructions, or constructs
* No statements regarding conformance to source code standards of any type or kind
* No statements regarding ES&S hardware or software engineering practices or design methods
* No statements regarding the use of preferred or non-preferred data structures, data types, data formats, databases, storage methods
* No statements rendering opinions on security techniques employed or not employed
* No statements discussing presence or absence of cryptography or other security methods and techniques
* No statements discussing relevance of any discoveries made in this review to any elections or contests outside the 2006 Sarasota General Election, U.S. House of Representative District 13 race
* No statements discussing the use or manner in which system passwords are used, constructed or stored.
* No statements regarding conformance to source code standards of any type or kind.
* No statements regarding use of desirable or undesirable style, techniques, instructions, logic, architecture, or implementation.
* No statements regarding the use of preferred or non-preferred data structures, data types, data formats, databases, storage methods.
* No statements regarding the fit and applicability of electronic technologies or this class of voting machines (i.e., Direct Recording Electronic, Touch Screen Systems) for elections in general.
* No statements regarding ES&S hardware or software engineering practices or design methods.