Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

PFAW Silence Day 3 -- AUDIO Public Service Announcements Condemning Them...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
BradBlog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 10:40 PM
Original message
PFAW Silence Day 3 -- AUDIO Public Service Announcements Condemning Them...
ORIGINAL URL FOR THIS STORY: http://www.bradblog.com/?p=4394




PFAW Silence Day 3: Still Misleading, Using My Name to Support Their Agenda, Refusing to Respond to Request for Correction, Cease and Desist
AUDIO FILES: Public Service Announcements Calling on Action Against PFAW, a Ban on DREs...


People For the American Way (PFAW) has yet to either respond to my formal request, or correct their unconscionable use of my name and website to help spread their misinformation about Election Reform and the Holt Bill (HR811) on their website. While I continue to consider them "the good guys", their deceitful behavior and lack of attention to this matter is making it harder and harder to hold on to that assessment.

Please let them hear from you: (pfaw@pfaw.org)

If you've haven't yet, please see my open letter to PFAW (http://www.bradblog.com/?p=4383) the day before last, demanding they cease their outrageous mischaracterization of my personal position on Election Reform, as well as my condemnation of the out-and-out dishonest misinformation on the Holt Election Reform bill that they are peddling there. All of that comes on top of their incredibly irresponsible advocacy in favor of the use of dangerous DRE touch-screen voting systems.

They know what they are doing. They are doing it anyway.

While the other major public advocacy groups in league with PFAW --- including MoveOn, Common Cause, VoteTrustUSA and others --- are not actively advocating for the use of DREs, as PFAW is, none of them have disassociated from PFAW's indefensible position or condemned them for their dishonest use of my name and website in support of their reckless agenda.

For those who have expressed skepticism about PFAW's position, since they are usually considered "good guys" in these matters, here's a quick sampling of some of their statements in support of DRE voting, as published on their website in the official PFAW's analysis of the Holt bill ( http://media.pfaw.org/PDF/SarasotaCD13/HoltAnalysis.pdf - from pages 2 & 3):

DRE technology offers better access options to voters with disabilities and voters who have minority language needs.
...
DRE technology is much more effective for minority language voters.
...
DREs afford voters with disabilities an opportunity to cast an independent secret ballot— something that optical scan paper ballots cannot fully do.

All demonstrably untrue, or misleading. Non-tabulating touch-screen ballot marking devices, which print a paper ballot, can be used for the disabled without disenfranchising voters and creating unverifiable electronic ballots. And DRE technology is not "much more effective for minority language voters," quite the opposite is true, in fact. They have no science to back up their position. None. Zero. Zip. Nadda.

Those statements, however, are at least out in the open. In their "Democracy Campaign FAQ", they have changed their tune, and used quite a bit of rhetorical sleight-of-hand to disguise their position dishonestly. See my open letter to them for a few of the most egregious examples.

...AUDIO PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENTS CONDEMNING PFAW'S DISHONEST BEHAVIOR & IN FAVOR OF A BAN ON DRE VOTING SYSTEMS...

I was asked by Cynthia Black of Action Point on KPHX 1480 (Air America/Nova M Phoenix) to record a couple of quick Public Service Announcements on these matters. They are now running on the station.

She suggested that I make them available for others to use as well. Feel free to pass these on to your favorite local radio station, or use them as you see fit. Two spots, one on PFAW, and one on the need to ban DRE/touch-screen voting systems in Rush Holt's HR811 bill...

-- "Contact PFAW!" PSA Spot |MP3, :26 seconds|
http://www.bradblog.com/Audio/ActionPoint_BradFriedman_PFAW_PSA.mp3

-- "Ban DREs!" PSA Spot |MP3, :26 seconds|
http://www.bradblog.com/Audio/ActionPoint_BradFriedman_DRE_PSA.mp3

ORIGINAL URL FOR THIS STORY: http://www.bradblog.com/?p=4394

---
Brad Friedman
THE BRAD BLOG - The uprising continues...
http://www.BradBlog.com
VELVET REVOLUTION - The revolution begins...
http://www.VelvetRevolution.us

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GregD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-11-07 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for all your good work Brad
So many of us appreciate your efforts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BradBlog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Thanks, GregD...I just hope....

That everyone is contacting PFAW and raising some hell.

They are gaming your democracy.

pfaw@pfaw.org

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GregD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. sent!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-12-07 03:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kick, (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC