EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: Clint Curtis Documents Evidence of Widespread 2006 Florida Election Fraud

[kpete]

EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: Clint Curtis Documents Evidence of Widespread 2006 Florida Election Fraud

The Whistleblower Turned U.S. House Candidate Continues His for Fight for Election Integrity and His Federal Challenge to his 2006 Race with the Corrupt Tom Feeney

-- Special to The BRAD BLOG By Guest Blogger Jim Cirile
NOTABLE QUOTES FROM CURTIS IN THE INTERVIEW:

"We have now found absolutely…more votes for Democrats than the official results show. Absolutely more votes. No trends, no guesses. More votes. That should never happen."

"The fact that we were robbed in the way we were is actually a blessing. It gives us a chance to prove it once and for all."

"If the Democrats had stuck with the 50-state strategy, I think they would have had better numbers than they had, but then again, if your machines aren’t counting, it doesn’t matter how much money you spend."

http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/linkframe.php?linkpg=http://www.bradblog.com/?p=4220&linkid=31643

[Stevepol]

1. I sent Curtis a contribution, and AM I GLAD NOW. Go Clint!!!

I'll send him twice as much next time. Any candidate willing to fight for his constituents as Clint is deserves money not just from his constituents but from anybody.

[bleever]

4. So did I.

I think it's still paying off, with more to come.

[Senator]

2. Note The Audit Process Here Folks -- A REAL "Inventory"

What Curtis is doing, in effect, is to audit the signature books themselves. Yes, an arduous process, but the only thing that circumvents any and all types of election theft techniques.

He's doing a survey of the electorate. Which is what an election really is -- not a contest or competition.

This is what none of the "improved" election auditing proposals offer. Any auditor/accountant in the business world will tell you that something on a piece of paper, even an "audit trail," is just that. To audit a business you must go to the shelves (or docks, or warehouses) and inspect/count the actual products in person.

In an election that means a live human being -- being asked if they did in fact vote and for whom. (No, "privacy" would not be a problem.) Even a small random sampling audit, using this (real) process, would be a stone deterrent to election thieves.

There's no way to game it. No "ghost" voters. No pumped-up registration rolls. No stuffed ballot boxes or memory cards.

Coupled with severe punishment (life in prison?, OK 20 years) for attempts to "unlawfully effect" an election result by say, more than 5 votes, and we'd have the confidence we deserve in our elections.

It's not rocket science. Just a brute force solution that overcomes any techno-politico manipulation.

--

[robinlynne]

3. Thankyou kpete and thank you CLINT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Mister Ed]

5. K&R

[Divine Discontent]

6. I verified my vote for him

by going to the website his staff provided. I tried hard for him to win, and he was a tossup and somehow lost by like 10 points (off hand remembering) and we know of ALLL people FEENEY would rig the election, duh! if you know the curtis history with feeney you know feeney had the desire to rig it and the means. and sadly, cocoa/melbourne/titusville has lots of right wing nuts in it and they run a lot of the gov't here.

www.cafepress.com/warisprofitable <--- NEW 08 STICKERS AND ANTI BUSH LAUGHERS!

[Kurovski]

7. One is left to wonder how many landslide wins were denied us by election fraud.

in '06

[jarnocan]

8. K&R so sad this guy and many others lost due to FRAUD

and now we are still suffering more because of it.