Minnesota to make election history again with first-ever post election revi...

[katinmn]

News Release from the Citizens for Election Integrity Minnesota and League of Women Voters Minnesota

For additional background on the election review law, please visit www.ceimn.org

Media Contacts: Mark Halverson, 612-724-1736, [e-mail] or Kathy Stone, 651-646-3224, [e-mail]

Minnesota to make election history again with first-ever post election review

St. Paul, MN – October 24, 2006 – The accuracy of Minnesota’s e-voting machines will be assessed this fall thanks to a new state law that takes effect with this year’s elections. Races for federal office and the governor’s race will be reviewed to assess the accuracy of e-voting machines.

Numerous problems have been documented nationally with e-voting machines, particularly direct recording electronic (DRE) systems. While Minnesota does not use DREs, the optical scanners that Minnesota uses are subject to many of the same risks for potential programming errors as DREs.

“The post-election review offers the best way to assess the accuracy of our voting machines and help ensure an accurate vote count,” according to Mark Halvorson, director and co-founder of Citizens for Election Integrity Minnesota. “The optical scan voting machines used in Minnesota are considered reliable but have never been reviewed to assess their accuracy. The state legislature passed a law to assess the accuracy of the machines.”

The new review law requires a hand count of randomly selected precincts in every county. If the hand count from the review shows a difference greater than 0.5 percent compared to the machine count from election day, further hand counts are required.

Citizens for Election Integrity Minnesota, along with the League of Women Voters Minnesota, is organizing and training nonpartisan teams of volunteers in every county to observe the review. Minnesota is one of only 13 states to require a review and the only state where a review will be observed. To volunteer as a review observer, contact CEIMN at 800-976-8086 or visit www.ceimn.org.

Other Minnesota election notables:

* Minnesota enacted same-day voter registration in 1974 which opens voting to more residents who may have moved or are voting for the first time.
* Minnesota had the highest citizen voting rate at 79 percent during the 2004 presidential election. (U.S. Census Bureau)
* Minneapolis voters will decide in November whether to adopt Instant Run-Off Voting (IRV). If adopted, Minneapolis will join San Francisco and Vermont in advancing this step toward election reform.

Citizens for Election Integrity Minnesota is a non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to ensuring an accurate vote count. CEIMN educates citizens about our election system, publicizes news about voting technology, encourages citizen participation in the election process and advocates for election reform. For more information visit www.ceimn.org.

The League of Women Voters Minnesota is a multi-issue, grassroots volunteer organization of concerned women and men working together to better understand and influence the issues that affect us, our families, and our future. It is a political, but non-partisan, organization dedicated to researching complex questions from all viewpoints. The League does not support or oppose any political party or candidate. For more information visit www.lwvmn.org.

[BonnieJW]

1. This is wonderful!!

How do we get this to happen in our respective states????

[katinmn]

5. Get someone to sponsor the legislation. Here's the law in MN

Citizens for Election Integrity Minnesota started working on this after what happened in Ohio and elsewhere.

http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/bin/bldbill.php?bill=S2743.2.html&session=ls84

[The Brethren]

9. Congratulations to MN

And thanks katinmn for the info. and the link....will follow MN's lead.

[Greeby]

2. That's OK, the Repukes will just direct the theft elsewhere nt

[datadiva]

3. Oh Wow!

Wish this was for all the states. Go Minnesota!

[katinmn]

4. Thanks! Wish us luck. If it goes well, it can be replicated elsewhere.

:toast:

[The Count]

6. Great, because Mondale was robbed in 2002.

[Wilms]

7. It's all in the numbers.

What percentage will be audited. That's the real question.

http://www.votetrustusa.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1664&Itemid=26

[katinmn]

8. Ideally we'd have hand-counted paper ballots nationwide.

yes indeedy

[Wilms]

10. Ideally. Yes. But that's not what I was trying to point out.

And it pains me to say it as I appreciate the effort.

But an inadequate audit touted as one that can check the accuracy of the voting system may well be worse than no audit at all. A potentially false sense of security seems to be fostered by this story.

But I'll hope that you all have opportunity to improve it.

[rumpel]

11. ...

:applause:

[garybeck]

12. cool! Which 13 states require review?