Ed Schulz is talking election issues

[WestHoustonDem]

and is talking about a very interesting study that spells out the discrepancies.

Randi's a repeat.

[corky44]

1. What study would that be

because a whole lot of Ivory Tower Types are not convinced
and we need to move them.

[WestHoustonDem]

3. Didn't catch the name of the study

But the bottom line is, even if the results of the election don't change, we need to ensure the veracity of the voting system and there are serious questions about the results in several states that need to be looked into.

I'm not ready to move on. I regret moving on so quickly in 2000 and I try not to make the same mistake twice.

[NewYorkerfromMass]

4. The veracity of this vote is impossible to verify

thanks to paperless e-voting.

[Kralizec]

7. the real question, the, is

if we can't recount because of this "overlooked" flaw, do we merely accept? I can't think of people just laying down after it is proven that no paper trail can be pursued...

[futurecitizen]

9. Some in the ivory towers are watching

This document, for example, is the most concise and powerful thing I've read about the most obvious problem in this election: http://www.ilcaonline.org/freeman.pdf

FC

[WestHoustonDem]

10. University of - Pennsylvania Dr, Steven F. Freeman

http://www.buzzflash.com/alerts/04/11/ale04090.html

[Ducks In A Row]

2. Ed's a blowhard who thinks that bush won fair and square

[Kralizec]

5. Nader is making the point we have all

been trying to make. And we just kept getting written off as "conspiracy theorists". Ughhh. Nader is saying it perfectly.

[shib]

6. //

Where the fuck has Randi been?

[Kralizec]

8. she was scheduled to be off today, doctors appoint.