Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Roy Lipscomb: Give us "old fashioned" paper ballots.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 07:20 PM
Original message
Roy Lipscomb: Give us "old fashioned" paper ballots.
My response to Trib Editorial "Hacking the vote"
by Roy Lipscomb, Illinois Ballot Integrity Project
http://www.opednews.com

--
My "letter to the editor"

Thanks much for your editorial about the Brennan
report, the latest in a string of exposes on the
unreliability of electronic voting machines.
("Hacking the Vote," July 11, 2006, Section 1,
page 14:http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/chi-0607110260jul11,0,7284618.story?coll=chi-newsopinion-hed)

........................

We seem to have lost sight of the goal.

Job one for election officials isn't to speed up
the tallying, or to deploy high-tech window
dressing, or to ease the workload of election
officials.

Job one for election officials is to make sure
elections are honest.

Delegated that job, voting machines just lean on
their shovels.

Give us "old fashioned" paper ballots.

--Roy Lipscomb

much more at:
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_roy_lips_060720_my_response_to_trib_.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JHH Donating Member (265 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. That is what Canada uses
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. More......


Yes, the City and County do offer a bandage for
voting-machines ailments: a paper record of each
voter's choices, one that the voter has a chance
to verify first-hand.

Those paper records are designed to reveal the
correct tally when a machine is suspected of
giving an incorrect one.

But wait a minute. Doesn't that imply that the
voter-verified paper record is more reliable than
the machine?

If so, why did we waste more than $50 million on
systems that are less reliable than paper?

-------------------------

Thanks, kpete, that's a hoot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. But we can't get it done by November! So, what do we do?
I say: Massive citizen BOYCOTT OF THE MACHINES! Vote Absentee! REFUSE TO USE THE MACHINES!

AB voting is not safe, but it IS a PROTEST against the rigged machines. It's like the Montgomery bus boycott, which didn't solve segregation all by itself, but pointed the way. Rosa Parks refused to go the back of the bus. She refused to participate in that corrupt, racist system. But in this case, we MUST vote. (Turnout is our only chance to beat the machine advantage to Bushites this November.) We can't boycott voting. But we CAN boycott the rigged machines. Corrupt election officials just scan the AB votes right into the electronic system, it's true. BUT we DON'T HAVE TO PARTICIPATE in that. That's them. This is us. We won't use the goddamned things. And if nobody will vote on them, what good are they?

And, if enough people do it, all their shiny, new, extremely expensive election theft machinery will be gathering dust--obsolete before it's time. THEN we have American Revolution II: Election reform!

More: It's easy! Everybody can do it! EVERYBODY--all that 70% of discontented Americans--can EASILY participate in this protest against rigged elections.

I think it's a winner.

And I don't see any other ideas floating around for a massive, high participation protest, for when the Bushites steal Election no. 3. Imagine the American people sending a mountain of paper Absentee Ballots to every Registrar in the country, to count! Ha! HA! Big monkey wrench!

Bumper sticker: "Bust the Machines--Vote Absentee!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-20-06 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. Remember when the food in the future would be little pills?
We all still chew the real stuff.

What's wrong with paper ballots? They take a long time to count, but what's the damn hurry? People don't assume the office for a month or more after the election. Why not take the time to be sure the winner is actually the person seated?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-21-06 03:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC