Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Yurica Report in support of RFK article: A Vast Political Misfortune

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Helga Scow Stern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 01:50 PM
Original message
Yurica Report in support of RFK article: A Vast Political Misfortune
http://www.yuricareport.com/Campaign2004/AVastPoliticalMisfortune.html

She writes delightfully, and knows right wing subversiveness and its intentions and tricks like the back of her hand:


A Vast Political Misfortune



Or Why Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. is Correct in His Assessment
of the Late 2004 Election (which was sadly murdered by the G.O.P.,
may it rest in peace). And Why Salon.com’s Article Attacking Kennedy is Wrong.



By Katherine Yurica
June 11, 2006





It has been reported that Lysenko, the Soviet biologist, made
the following demonstration during a lecture: he put a flea on his desk and
said, "Jump!" Presently the flea jumped. He then removed the flea's hind legs
and said, "Jump!" again. This time the flea did not jump. "Observe,
gentlemen," said Lysenko: "This proves that when you remove the flea's hind
legs, its hearing is impaired.

Monroe Beardsley





If one is an old Ent, one does not like to be hasty. However, circumstances have a way of forcing themselves upon us and occasionally we are called upon to analyze something minutely, which nowadays goes against the grain, in as much as thinking, itself, is out of style. This latter fact is lamentable, but let us not tarry on it. Instead, let us go forward, analytically speaking.



On June 3, 2006 Farhad Manjoo, a 27 year old writer for Salon.com, penned a denunciation of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s article, “Was the 2004 Election Stolen?” published by Rolling Stone. Mr. Manjoo mentioned that many major studies and analyses of the 2004 election existed, and then lamented that those studies were followed by “legions of activists, academics, bloggers and others who’ve devoted their post-Nov. 2 lives to unearthing every morsel of data that might suggest the vote was rigged.”



You can easily note that Mr. Manjoo and Salon.com are not in a generous mood in their essay. The very best of his ungracious statements is this one: “If you do read Kennedy’s article, be prepared to machete your way through numerous errors of interpretation and his deliberate omission of key bits of data.” Oh dear, Mr. Manjoo’s words are so, so violent—so uncharitable to the innocent sentences as well as to the guilty ones, if there are in fact any guilty ones at all. For starting with Mr. Manjoo’s very first assertion, which I admit was so convincing on the surface that the Yurica Report posted a warning to its readers to drive by with caution when reading and slow down to a crawl when passing Mr. Kennedy’s powerful imagery.



Alas, Mr. Manjoo and Salon.com make the mistake of holding Mr. Kennedy to the literal meaning of words and quotes, much like critics of the Bible do, but just as metaphors are not meant to be taken literally by the poets who penned them, statistics are not meant to be taken literally either. Numbers are metaphors that need interpretation (a fact Mr. Manjoo admits, but transgresses when he asks us to anoint him: “the Grand Interpreter!”)

more:

http://www.yuricareport.com/Campaign2004/AVastPoliticalMisfortune.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. This was an excellent rebuttal. Good to see posted again.
It was posted a few days ago, so in case you don't get many responses, don't feel bad!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Helga Scow Stern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Thanks, I hadn't seen it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnTheOtherHand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-14-06 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. why this is wrong
Yurica's example posits that equal proportions of newly registered Democrats and Republicans cast provisional ballots -- which will, of course, disadvantage Democrats if they have more new registrants. But the DNC report estimated provisional ballot rates for all Kerry and Bush voters (or rather, for Kerry and Bush voters in Cuyahoga).

Manjoo does leave out next steps. Given that there are more Democrats than Republicans in Cuyahoga (in fact, Kerry beat Bush more than 2:1), and that Kerry supporters' provisional ballots were counted at a lower rate than Bush supporters', we can roughly estimate that the 8100 uncounted PBs in Cuyahoga may've split about 3:1 for Kerry. That is about 4,000 net votes. Cuyahoga is the most Democratic county in Ohio, but if we nonetheless apply the same 3:1 ratio to all the uncounted PBs in the state, that nets maybe 17,000 or 18,000.

It's nice that Yurica doesn't cast Manjoo as an Enemy of the People.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC