Diebold problems in Ohio? Yep.. In Florida? Yep.. BUT ALASKA !?!? (+post)

[kster]

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x2331628

[handsignals4theblind]

1. SIMPLE WAY to solve this problem -electronic voting corruption

-Computerised voting- their software is not open to public scrutiny-----An MIT- CAlTEch study done in 2001 shows that manually counted paper ballots are the most accurate system out of 5 sytems used in the last 4 presidential elections------more Open and verifiable!
----

[kster]

2. Keep explaining that to everyone

you know, and welcome to the DU.....

[nicknameless]

3. I just ran across that .pdf file again yesterday.

Interesting coincidence :)
http://www.hss.caltech.edu/~voting/CalTech_MIT_Report_Version2.pdf

Welcome to DU, handsignals4theblind :hi:

[Einsteinia]

4. Hmmm, a pattern is developing. . . .

Maybe now some of the Stepford Dems will start believing what we've all been saying since 2000!

[Chi]

5. If there's 'No problem' it shouldn't be an issue to let them count.

But I bet dollars to donuts they fight tooth and nail to prevent it.

""If you don't have a degree in mathematics or engineering, it will always be confusing," said Randy Ruedrich, chairman of the Alaska Republican Party, who said he's asked the state to change its format next time around."

LOL...nothing to look at here, move along.
It was nice knowing ya, Democracy.