Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FL: Touchy voting issue returns - Volusia to decide on touch-screens

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 05:40 AM
Original message
FL: Touchy voting issue returns - Volusia to decide on touch-screens


Touchy voting issue returns
Volusia to decide on touch-screens

By JAMES MILLER
Staff Writer

Last update: December 11, 2005

snip

The solution proffered by County Chairman Frank Bruno is to replace the county's current paper-ballot system with a similar paper-ballot system and additional touch screens from Nebraska-based Election Systems & Software for $2.6 million.

Under the deal, the company would exchange the touch screens for the paper-ballot marking AutoMARK, a device with audio capabilities already being purchased for use by disabled voters in some other states, when it's approved for use in Florida. If the technology is not certified in Florida by a date still under negotiation -- probably May 1 or June 1 -- the county could return the entire system for a refund.

The alternative preferred by Supervisor of Elections Ann McFall is to keep the current system and buy touch screens without paper ballots from the current system's vendor, Texas-based Diebold Election Systems, for $780,000. In either case, federal grant money would pay for about $700,000 of the cost.

snip

The battle heated up recently when activist Susan Pynchon of the DeLand-based Florida Fair Elections Coalition launched an e-mail missive charging the state with improperly certifying Diebold's newest touch screen.

She cited evidence from a public records request showing one of four machines brought to the state for testing in March failed, but the state didn't acknowledge it. Among her other numerous charges is that AutoMARK for its certification test was required to recreate the 2004 general election in Miami-Dade County with almost 800,000 ballots, while Diebold in its test was required to run only 10,010 ballots.

"You know what it really seems like to me?" said Pynchon, who strongly supports the Election Systems & Software deal. "It seems as though the state of Florida does not want verified elections."

snip

SideBars

Here's a look at Volusia County's two proposed voting technology contracts:

Here's a recap of Volusia County's efforts to acquire accessible voting machines for people with disabilities in Volusia County:

snip

http://www.news-journalonline.com/NewsJournalOnline/News/Headlines/03NewsHEAD03121105.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. It is abominable that fed dollars are available to convert
vote counting to electronic paperless systems.

While there have been some successes where the people have been able to steer elections officials away from bad buying decisions, the march toward paperless voting seems unstoppable.

Just like the war in Iraq, Americans are being made to pay for something against our best interests.

Replace Congress in 2006.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aviation Pro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-11-05 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. Mr. Bruno's proposal....
...should be vehemently opposed by everyone in Volusia County and througout the country. You can leave a message for him at (386) 304-5533.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC