Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Diebold threatened violators with immediate dismissal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
kansasblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 12:08 PM
Original message
Diebold threatened violators with immediate dismissal
Diebold threatened violators with immediate dismissal," the insider, who we'll call DIEB-THROAT, explained recently to The BRAD BLOG via email. "In 2005, after one newly hired member of Diebold's technical staff pointed out the security flaw, he was criticized and isolated."

www.bradblog.com

EXCLUSIVE! * A DIEBOLD INSIDER SPEAKS!
DIEB-THROAT : 'Diebold System One of Greatest Threats Democracy Has Ever Known'
Identifies U.S. Homeland Security 'Cyber Alert' Prior to '04 Election Warning Votes Can be 'Modified Remotely' via 'Undocumented Backdoor' in Central Tabulator Software!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Caution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wish people would stop with the constant referral to Watergate
it cheapens their own arguments. The two have nothing in common and frankly there should be a corollary to Godwin's Law that states:

The more any scandal begins to infuriate the Democratic Party of the U.S. the sooner the Watergate scandal will be invoked.

It's pathetic and it doesn't help to raise awareness about the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Time for change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It seems to me that they have a LOT in common
Both Watergate and the theft of the 2004 election involved Republican Presidents who were trying to accumulate vast amounts of power into their own hands through illegal means. Why do you say that they have nothing in common?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoBushSpokenHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-16-05 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Recommended n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC