|
As Skinner said in another thread... "If these are absentee ballots, why would they push the total number of votes over the number of registered voters?"
My response to that question is:
Forget all the double-speak... disbursement of absentee votes, blah, blah, blah...
You have to be a registered voter to even get an absentee ballot. If you vote by absentee ballot, you can't vote at the precinct on election day because you already voted by absentee ballot. Therefore, the adding of absentee ballots or where they added them, etc. doesn't mean squat. The fact remains that there are still all these EXTRA votes... MORE votes then there are REGISTERED voters.
To claim that the extra votes are absentee votes would be admission that they didn't do a blessed thing to ensure that absentee voters didn't ALSO vote at the poll on election day, i.e., they'd be admitting that they let all these people vote twice.
------------------------------------
Now, to add a little more to that... considering how many provisional ballots there were, they were being extremely careful about the voting procedure. It's outrageous to assume that they were being so careful when allowing someone to vote even ONCE while also being extremely incompetent about allowing someone to vote MORE THAN ONCE.
If they're trying to claim these EXTRA votes are absentee votes, then they are admitting GROSS INCOMPETENCE.
The whole reason we have all this registration and paperwork and double checking is to make sure that only those people who are permitted to vote by law are allowed to cast a ballot AND that none of those people are voting MORE THAN ONCE.
|