Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cuyahoga BOE excuse is bull...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 12:48 AM
Original message
Cuyahoga BOE excuse is bull...
So, when it gets discovered in Franklin County that one machine (at a Falwell church!) awarded 3,800 extra votes to Bush, it's acknowledged as a "glitch."

Later we discover that Cuyahoga BOE (optical scan/punch card) thousands of more voters than registrations in certain wards and townships. So you have in some cases 10 or 15 times as many ostensible voters as registered voters in the township (often in wards that are centrally counted.)

The next day, Cuyahoga BOE claims this is merely a way to "park" absentee ballots. As a preliminary device, these are added to given townships within a Congressional district, before a subsequent count.

Why? Why not just tabulate a separate category for absentee ballots within a given CD, rather than adding the absentees to a township to which they do not actually belong, and artificially inflating its preliminary vote total, and creating this confusion?

This seems to unnecessarily create confusion. IN fact, it makes no sense. Why must the absentee ballots be parked anywhere, other than their own category?!

I'm sorry, I don't buy it. This just seems to be a way to invite confusion, and very suspicious given the overall circumstances.

I'm realizing that it's ALWAYS been this way... we have always a big confusion of conflicting numbers and mistakes... and it happens to provide a perfect cover for fraud.

How naive I was, back in the 1980s, thinking that the way to fix elections was to keep people ignorant, tell big lies and control the media.

Ah, but how simple it is to add robbery to the mix!

What a farce it is. Voting will never again make sense without simple paper ballots that are kept and counted by hand, not just by party operatives, but with independents present.

Fat chance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. Basically
And even without "glitches" there's so much conflict of interest in the elections it's a total farce. Who in the world but a politician would think it's a good idea for State Elections Supervisors to be partisan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pk_du Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-10-04 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. Couldnt agree more.....what a bullshit POS excuse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC