|
I don't know how to post JPGs of the raw data I collated for this analysis so I'll just give you the results of my research on Florida:
Three way cross tabulation: Machine Vs who won in 2000 Vs Percentage change in votes
Touchscreen machines used in counties that went to Bush in 2000 Mean change in votes for Republican +34.8% with SD = 12.7 n = 10 Mean change in votes for Democrat +25.6% with SD = 9.4 n = 10
Touchscreen machines used in counties that went to Gore in 2000 Mean change in votes for Republican +30.8% with SD = 11.7 n = 5 Mean change in votes for Democrat +19.2% with SD = 4.5 n = 5
Opti-Scan machines used in counties that went to Bush in 2000 Mean change in votes for Republican +39.5% with SD = 8.8 n = 42 Mean change in votes for Democrat +22.0% with SD = 13.1 n = 42
Opti-Scan machines used in counties that went to Gore in 2000 Mean change in votes for Republican +40.2% with SD = 12.5 n = 10 Mean change in votes for Democrat +31.0% with SD = 13.7 n = 10
Those really, really vast counties that made up a lot of the Gore vote were given touch screens. If you get a 25% increase in Dem votes and the base is a really big number, it translates into a huge gain for Kerry. If you know you will lose a county where there are a lot of votes expected, you simply trash as many votes as possible without regard to who cast them. Thus the bizarre 5% differential between Bush 2000 and Gore 2000 counties that have identical machines.
The beauty of this analysis is that there is one BIG fraud that is easy to overlook and lots of little vote skims which I'll write up tomorrow when I've had some sleep. Please share this with others. Make pretty charts and all that wonderful stuff.
I'll post the rest of what I'm finding tomorrow. If anyone can tell me how to post JPG files here, I can at least show you the spread sheets I generated even if you won't be able to cut'n'paste the data. Even better, if there is a way to display spread sheets, tell me all about it in a PM. Thanks!
Faun
|