Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Texas Electors Not Required To Follow Popular Vote

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 12:44 AM
Original message
Texas Electors Not Required To Follow Popular Vote
Mon Nov 1,10:26 PM ET Local - KEYE

As long as he's breathing, Peter Wrench says he'll cast his electoral vote for GOP President Bush (news - web sites). But as one of the state's 34 Republican electors, Wrench could vote for Democrat John Kerry (news - web sites) even if Texas voters back Bush. Texas is one of 22 states that doesn't require members of its electoral college to vote in alignment with the results of the election. The 538 member electoral college gathers on December 13th to select the nation's next president based on the election. Wrench says he and other Republican electors signed pledges promising their vote to Bush if he wins the Texas vote. The Texas Democratic Party has its own set of 34 electors. Each state's number of electors is equal to the total number of the state's delegation. For Texas, that's 32 US House members and two senators.

----------------

I guarantee if either one of those Texas electors vote for John Kerry, their days would be numbered. The Bush crime family don't play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. 32 House members.
The telling of the tale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Of those 15 were Dem now we only have 11
We lost four with a lot of seniority in the House that really hurt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedda_foil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. 22 states don't require the electors to vote per the popular vote!
This is even more hideous than I thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CindyDale Donating Member (941 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Isn't this one of the reasons for having an electoral college?
To keep we, the ignorant masses, from electing an inappropriate president?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-05-04 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. The original plan was
for state legislatures to choose electors who were noteworthy citizens but not office holders.

Those electors would vote for people they thought would make good presidents.

When the electoral votes were counted the House of Representatives would elect the president from the top three electoral vote winners.

The voters were not part of the system and there was (and still is not today) any requirement at all for any popular vote of the people.

South Carolina, one of the 13 original states in fact did not hold a popular vote for president until 1868.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC