|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
shiina (294 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 05:07 PM Original message |
AP Wire: Chief justice refuses to remove self from vote challenge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GetTheRightVote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 05:09 PM Response to Original message |
1. I just tried the link, it said requested article not there ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shiina (294 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 06:20 PM Response to Reply #1 |
9. correct link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 05:09 PM Response to Original message |
2. Moyers is unethical in not recusing himself. Guess he does have 10 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 05:09 PM Response to Original message |
3. Move on, folks. It's just another corrupt, Repub, Chief "Justice". NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor O (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
4. WTF Arnebeck does it again!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 05:42 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. True....and calling his motions and attachments "woefully inadequate" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rfrrfrrfr (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 05:51 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Um |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor O (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 06:00 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. If the affadavits are bad, any actions that Moyer took |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rfrrfrrfr (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 08:00 PM Response to Reply #7 |
21. That presumes the Affidavits are bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 06:06 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Legally there is no connection between the two cases |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eowyn_of_rohan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 06:33 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. Quit trashing Arnebeck on thread after thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor O (222 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 06:38 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. From the results of hte past few days, I am not sure who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eowyn_of_rohan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 06:47 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Many of us have contributed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cyberpj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 06:49 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Bravo! Agreed! eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 06:56 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. It 's statement like that that make people question your credibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eowyn_of_rohan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 07:03 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Who's questioning besides you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
righteous1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 07:08 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. I have not jumped on the "trash" Arnebeck bandwagon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eowyn_of_rohan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 07:10 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. What did you think of Katherine Harris's reading of FLA law? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojorabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 06:40 PM Response to Original message |
12. I do have a question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fooj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 06:59 PM Response to Original message |
16. WHAT ARE THEY HIDING? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 07:02 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. What ARE they hiding??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andy_Stephenson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
22. Moyer is so full of himself and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Dec-29-04 09:33 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Fuck Moyer! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC