Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge Blocks Count of New Wash. Ballots

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
pbartch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 08:41 PM
Original message
Judge Blocks Count of New Wash. Ballots
Judge Blocks Count of New Wash. Ballots

1 hour, 47 minutes ago
By REBECCA COOK, Associated Press Writer

TACOMA, Wash. - A judge Friday granted a state Republican Party request to block the counting of hundreds of recently discovered King County ballots in Washington's extremely close governor's race.

Even if the election workers wrongly rejected the ballots, it is too late for King County to reconsider them now, Pierce County Superior Court Judge Stephanie Arend said.

From reading state law and state Supreme Court decisions, "it is clear to me that it is not appropriate to go back and revisit decisions on whether ballots should or should not be counted," Arend said.

State Democratic Party Chairman Paul Berendt said the party will appeal the decision.

"We're going to fight for every vote to count in the state of Washington," he said. "I guess we're headed to the (state) Supreme Court."

Republican Dino Rossi won the Nov. 2 election over Democrat Christine Gregoire by 261 votes in the first count and by 42 after a machine recount of the 2.9 million votes cast.

Additional votes have been tallied in a hand recount sought by Democrats, but on Friday afternoon, with all but two counties reporting, Rossi had gained just one net vote for a 43-vote lead over Gregoire.

King County — the state's most populous and a Gregoire stronghold — and Spokane County are the only two that haven't finished their manual recounts.

King County officials and Democrats had wanted to include 723 newfound ballots in the hand recount, saying they are valid ballots that were mistakenly rejected because of county workers' errors.
Republicans sued, saying it was too late to add ballots to the recount now.


http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20041217/ap_on_el_gu/washington_governor

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pbartch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. lousy stinking judge
It's not the voter's fault that the STUPID COUNTY people lost the votes.

WAY TO GO DEMOCRATS FOR TAKING THIS TO THE WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME COURT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yankeefanatic3 Donating Member (256 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. ACTIVIST JUDGE!
Impeach him...THIS is what an activist judge is! I hope the legislature or Gov. Locke can do something if the appeal does not go through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Activist judges, frivolous lawsuits - all from the GOP
And the media is silent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
satya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. Rossi-leaning counties may be playing by a different set of rules
The Seattle PI reported on Dec. 10 that New votes surface in recount

"New votes continued to turn up yesterday in the governor's race recount, with 17 of 39 counties reporting, but Christine Gregoire still has not benefited from the hand tally commissioned last week by the state Democratic Party."
...
"So far, none of the counties has reviewed disqualified ballots. The additional votes were either found after being misfiled or counted because a closer examination revealed voter intent that had previously been overlooked."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. Can you say APPEAL?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandem5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm at a total loss... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wlubin Donating Member (190 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't get it. Isn't that what a recount of for? Isn't the purpose of
a recount is to find errors? What a moron judge! hahahaha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. we'll win next week
And from a later article by the same writer at
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/aplocal_story.asp?category=6420&slug=WA%20Governor%20Recount%20Legal

But King County, the state Democratic Party and the secretary of state's office disagreed with the ruling. They point to the state law - RCW 29A.60.210 - referenced in the Supreme Court ruling.
This law says, in full:

"Whenever the canvassing board finds that there is an apparent discrepancy or an inconsistency in the returns of a primary or election, the board may recanvass the ballots or voting devices in any precincts of the county. The canvassing board shall conduct any necessary recanvass activity on or before the last day to certify the primary or election and correct any error and document the correction of any error that it finds."
Because the hand recount has not yet been certified, the Democrats and King County argue, the King County Recanvassing Board has the right to go back and correct errors.
Republican Secretary of State Sam Reed joined their argument. Thomas Ahearne, a lawyer representing Reed's office, said Friday in court that the secretary of state's office has interpreted state law the same way King County has.
"The recount statute does not require wholesale reconsideration" of rejected ballots, Ahearne said, but "it does grant each county canvassing board the discretion to recanvass selected ballots if there are discrepancies or inconsistencies ... that is what King County did."

State Elections Director Nick Handy said other county canvassing boards have reconsidered ballots and added them to the first or second recounts in the governor's race. King County's case is extreme in the number of ballots involved, but Handy said it's the same legal principle.

"In similar situations in other counties, ballots like these were counted," Handy said.


With all of this, I don't see how that judge's ruling can stand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. One decent Repug Sec. of State out there, I guess....
There should be no question, regardless of party affiliation. This is damned ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemis12 Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. I don't know enough about the law...
Edited on Fri Dec-17-04 10:59 PM by bemis12
... to say whether the ruling was proper or not. But I don't think it's going to matter. Gregoire should get all she needs without those ballots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pointsoflight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. Nothing like suing so that legit votes aren't counted.
What a sad day for our country when partisan politics takes precedence over the sanctity of the vote that is at the very foundation of our democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
11. Democrat Christine Gregoire to file an appeal ASAP

Govenor or Prsident...the repugs just don't want recounts, this will change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proudbluestater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-04 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
13. This is just disgusting
It's bad enough we're divided into blue/red states and blue/red voters, now it appears that LAWS themselves are applied differently depending on whether you are red or blue. What happened to the equal protection clause? WTF?????

Why are LAWS suddenly being ignored, deemed "quaint" and even the Supreme Court rulings are ignored by the Repukes? How do you raise your children to follow the rules when half of the leadership of the country does not even obey the most basic rules?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC