Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone else notice Edwards was the only one that was angry?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:19 PM
Original message
Anyone else notice Edwards was the only one that was angry?
Why were the Kerry people smiling and laughing( the little I saw) Where was Theresa? Was she there? I think there is a real difference of opinion between Edwards and Kerry regarding this concession. Anybody else feel that way? Anybody else think the Kerry lack of anger was odd?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mcg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, quite odd, I don't understand it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flammable Materials Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
36. What's there to understand?
Skull & Bones conceded to Skull & Bones.

Privilege conceded to privilege.

We thought we'd have someone to fight for us to the bitter end. We were suckers.

What's there to understand?

DISCLAIMER: I'm drunk on Belgian ale tonight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. I do think that Edwards wanted to fight some more
but Kerry didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Thats what I got.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
75. for one thing, he's out of a job.
didn't run in senate again,lost his seat to a repuke.

for another, he KNOWS what this W. victory will to poor people, he used to be one, wherease kerry and thk will be fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockydem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. He's crushed
It's his way of dealing with it.

Leave him alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. Then Maybe It's For The Best
If he gets crushed this easily, then perhaps he wasn't up to the challenge after all.:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mlawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. This easily?
I have never given up a Senate seat, and then run for VP and lost, after being almost assured that I would win. I have no idea what that is like, but I might well feel 'crushed' after such a thing. This time last night, they probably were 99% sure they would win, after the exit polls (which were correct).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #26
78. Well, I'm crushed.
If he's half as angry and irritated as I am, he showed it pretty well.

You're not up to a challenge if you look upset?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. do you have a link to Edwards' speech or statement? I missed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
23. Democracy Now! probably has it
I just heard it on my local community station.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. thank you, I will check.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
medeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. elite DC club
we're the idiots getting all upset. They play tennis together and make deals... (look at Kennedy and Orrin Hatch)

Never never let a congressman run for pres.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ramapo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. It just business to these guys
Sure Kerry wanted to win but at the end of the day he'll go to any of his homes and be just fine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Placebo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. His Political Career Is OVER.
So it's no wonder he's upset.

If he tries to run again in 2008, he will be Lieberman-ized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. We lost the South badly, he must be stunned
Edwards gambled everything on this race and lost big.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
58. I don't believe that...
Edwards has a gift that comes from his heart...not one that was purchased by a conglomerate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PinkTiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. John Kerry is too mature to show his anger
and for that he would have made a great president.

Leave him alone. Or I'll come get you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. He didn't have to be happy.
I supported John Kerry for three years. I have met him many times. I like him. This is weird .Sorry. Gore, whom I loathe for rolling over, didn't smile. Kerry is not insane. This is inappropriate behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Citizen Kang Donating Member (424 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. You loathe Gore?
For rolling over? At least he stood and fought until the Supreme Court decided the election. At least he ran a campaign that WON the popular vote. Kerry was a disaster from the start, but hey, he's more "electable" right?

You, and many on DU, owe Al Gore an apology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. I owe him nothing. He might try
paying some of his campaign staff that he stiffed. He might also say "thank you " to some of his supporters in 2000. Ask Donna Brazile what she thinks of Gore. As for Kerry. The jury is out yet but I am not pleased with him either. But We owe Gore nothing. He also hid for two years and then wouldn't run when he had the moral imperative. He had everyone's backing and he didn't run. Maybe we should blame him for this debacle too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #22
45. Donna Brazile is friends with ROVE.
At least Gore waited a few fucking days. Kerry folded like a Chinese menu.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #19
46. Agreed. Gore fought - and had much less support than Kerry.
Gore was anti-war. Gore spoke out.
These two - clowns! Thet kept bragging about how they were so much better prepared than Gore - lawyers, observers, no surrender....They mocked Gore and than - kerplonk. Gore was hounded by the media much worse then Kerry - with no defenders. Yet he held as much as he could. But somehow, the two Johns get excused, and Gore still vilified. Go figure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
venus Donating Member (527 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #46
61. Gore was SILENT in 2000. How old are you. Do you have a
memory? Where do you think moveon.org came from. He kept telling us to "move on" after his disastrous court case losses. Please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Gramma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #61
80. Moveon.org actually originated with the House effort to impeach Clinton
instead of doing what we elected them to do, which is run the country. Moveon.org was formed to petition representatives to move on from impeachment to issues that matter/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #46
63. I didn't excuse them but two wrongs don't make a right!
If they are wrong that doesn't make Gore a hero. You can't rewrite history. Why didn't he recalim the presidency when everyone would have backed him in 2004? Guess you don't remember how stunned everyone was when ,out of the blue, he decided not to run. Guess you don't remember the Gore 2004 people who tried so hard to draft him. Big brave Al did squat. Hecrawled out of his two year funk when he was no longer in contention and he was risk free. He is a weenie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #63
70. Gore was stabbed in the back by his own party
Gore didn't choose not to run, he was forced out. Did you listen to his speech when he bowed out? If it was up to him, he would have ran. The Democrats wouldn't back him, because they all were jumping behind Kerry, Lieberman, and Gephardt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #70
72. He could have run anyway. Dean did and the DLC hated him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #63
81. Gore did a media tour 2 years ago
He went on all the shows, on all the networks. Shortly after that he announced he would not run in 2004.
My guess is he was finding out how the media would treat him as a candidate, and they let him know they planned to screw him again like they did in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prayin4rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
69. I sure hope that is not a shot at Edwards.
Or I may come get you. I am just kidding. (sort of)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PinkTiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #69
77. nawwwww.
I wouldn't diss Edwards. And catch me if you can (lol)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. Edwards put his Senate seat on the line
Kerry didn't

'nuff said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sequoia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. We should send him letters of support
and he can always move to California! We need someone to stand up to Nazi boy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. I'm ready to support Edward's Run For President
anytime, anyplace. Just say the word, John E. :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mlawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Me too, but we have GOT to solve the voting fraud
problems first, or no Dem will ever win again. Edwards will have time on his hands for a while now: he would be the perfect one to investigate these schemes, as he has money and resources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ohio rules Donating Member (283 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. Solution is to appeal to more voters
and bring them into the polling stations

hello!!!! half the nation didn't bother to vote!!

voter apathy, not fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mlawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Was this not a record turnout?
Did the exit polls not show Kerry ahead in FLA and OH??

Turnout was 80% in FLA, I believe I heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ohio rules Donating Member (283 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. How many people in the US that qualified to vote,didn't vote?
there are about 320 million people in the United States.
less than 150 Million voted.
Why?
170 million I find hard to believe are all under age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amazona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #31
42. people were on long lines as it is!
This country is not set up for 100 percent participation of voters. People waited hours even here in Louisiana. I waited almost an hour and I was there when the polls opened.

Some people waited 9 hours in Ohio.

Getting more people to the polls is not the answer. We were at capacity. We need to make sure the people who come out and vote have their votes fairly counted.

When you have people being turned away in New Orleans, when Louisiana was considered to be a lock for Bush, you have to figure dirty tricks were played in every state. This to me suggests a pattern of fraud. We need some investigators and we need more evidence. But I don't doubt what we will learn if we really dig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #31
47. Voting should be mandatory. Hefty fine if you can vote and don't.
Maybe then people will realize the fraud that most assuredly is going on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. lol....as long as you're at it....
why not make it mandatory to vote democratic?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #50
51. Do you think it's a bad idea for every citizen to be required to vote?
I don't care if they vote "other" - as long as they're involved, they'll wake up a little more.

I'm not into Nazi-esque goosestepping like the conservative crowd.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #51
55. i think requiring people to vote
is the goose-step route. it's called freedom. and i would much rather have informed voters than clueless people trying to avoid a fine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mlawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #55
67. Perfectly put!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #55
83. What About A Tax Break If You Vote?
A verifiable receipt would be required as proof, then comes the tax break. Call it bribery, who cares?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flaxbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #27
62. absolutely agreed on the fraud issue!
Dems aren't going ANYWHERE but down unless these stupid machines are thrown out. Sometimes technology is a burden, newer isn't always better. Simple crank-lever voting booths all the way... or at the very least, a paper trail in duplicate that you have to sign or verify before you leave the voting booth.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silvershadow Donating Member (321 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. My letters of support are going out tomorrow...they will have
my opinion that they should continue to stand up and fight the good fight for our issues instead of roll over. I will not be happy when Bush starts f-ing with Social Security and God knows what else he has planned for his second term. They should continue to hammer him on budget and deficit issues, and meaningful healthcare reform not another Bush "band aid".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Florida_Geek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
29. Take says it all
Kerry like Holy Joe still has a day job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matilda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
40. Why is Edwards' political career over?
I can understand how he must feel, but he's young enough to run for
office again, even if he has to wait a couple of years.

He really impressed me in his debate with Cheney, which is all I've
seen of him of course, he has a lot going for him.

Nixon came back from total defeat, so why can't Edwards (who IMO
is much more appealing than Nixon, and younger as well).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NavajoRug Donating Member (330 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #40
57. It's hard for a losing VP candidate to come back . . .
. . . no matter how good they may be. These people usually vanish from the political scene pretty quickly, and rarely draw much support if they run for the White House in the future. Look how quickly Geraldine Ferraro, Lloyd Bentsen, and Jack Kemp disappeared -- and people like Dan Quayle and Joe Lieberman did very poorly in later bids for the presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
48. Edwards polled before his run - he knew he'd lose.
Edited on Wed Nov-03-04 07:23 PM by robbedvoter
In the end , we lost a senate seat. Hurray for Edwards and his 2 Americas!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dickie Flatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. No. Kerry was obviously having some serious emotions
Yeah, he did the ol' smiley-laughy stuff for the cameras. But watch him speak - especially when he gets to the part about thanking people from the bottom of his heart. He's on the verge of tears. This is his lifelong dream, and now it is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
11. Different people react in different ways.
Of course, I'd have been angry like Edwards, but that's just me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
12. THK was there, looked sad and peeved n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doohickie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
14. Where was that anger during the campaign?
It might have come in handy if he had shown his attack dog side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Hello. You don't win a campaign on anger. Polarizing the electorate was
how Bush won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #18
41. And Bush won on that how? Doesn't the sword cut both ways?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #41
49. By making his supporters feel like a vote for him was a defense of him...
...personally and by making the vocal democratic opposition use up all their oxygen criticizing him so that the quiet Democratic followers weren't left with enough to vote for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #49
54. Baloney.
The Dems had plenty to vote for. The disgrace is that many didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #54
59. Meatballs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doohickie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #18
65. I think you just contradicted yourself
Bush won by polarizing the electorate... isn't that winning with anger?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-04 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #65
82. That's how fascists win and it's how Democrats lose.
Edited on Thu Nov-04-04 11:12 AM by AP
Democrats have never won on anger, and win when they show that hope should trump fear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AspenRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
15. Edwards took what was happening to this country personally
Edited on Wed Nov-03-04 06:29 PM by DesertedRose
He's said as much.

Of COURSE he was angry.

He should be.

At least he wanted to fight.

And Edwards was in attack mode, plenty of times during the campaign. The debate comes to mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mlawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
25. He was probably convinced we would win.
Which, IMO, we did, but it was stolen. Edwards understands this, but was powerless to keep going once Kerry gave up.

It's not in Edwards' psychological makeup to give in, I would guess; he is a scrapper. (Yes, he conceded the primary race, but he knew he was not going to win that.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ohio rules Donating Member (283 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. NOTHING WAS STOLEN !
the election has always been there for the taking
just get the other 50% elegible voters to show up and

problem solved....
Now what needs to be changed,gotten rid of to appeal to more people?

threaten to throw them in jail if they don't vote?
beat the crap out of them?
give them "free stuff" ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mlawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. This was a record turnout!
The results do not match the exit polls. Just as in 2002.

Do you think the repubs are above stealing elections??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #34
53. Why are you here?
DU is founded on the fact that b*sh stole the 2000 election.

Since you're here, you obviously endorse that view. As such, you're aware that the Republican party has no qualms about theft of elections.

So, if you're saying there was no fraud, when indeed fraud was evident or very likely (50k missing absentee ballots in FL, destroyed Dem voter registrations in Las Vegas and Ohio, BBV), I have to ask why you're even here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #34
56. Nice try. Some reading for you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
28. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #28
39. What is wrong ?
Edwards wasn't blaming Ohio. Is there a problem with votes being counted? And what do you mean" Pull an Al Gore?' Your post doesn't sound right. Al Gore's only problem was he didn't protest enough! Edwards seems to have been held back and I wish he wasn't. I think Edwards should go forward alone if need be. This "it would be to awful to divide the country" stuff has got to stop. We are already divided. I think we should take to the streets if we have to. We are pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. Al Gore fought. These two folded. Embarrasing scene. pathetic.
Edwards wanted to do a "speech" - since this is the only thing he got credit during the campaign (lots of it). before that, he bragged about voting tor Iraq (co-sponsored IWR)and Patriot Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spinzonner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
30. Kerry's decision to concede undercut, if not betrayed

the speech/announcement the Edwards made late last night/this morning about fighting to ensure the votes were counted.

I think he had personal cause to resent the decision. The question is whether Edward's statement was made on his own or in consultation with Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
43. I saw a guy posturing for the cameras and giving a parting "Son of a
Mill Worker" BS. How dares he say "I'll fight" when he never did? he conceded the primaries 3 h before the closing of the polls!
This is the guy who co-sponsored IWR
http://www.congress.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d107:SJ00046:@@@P
he may have been pissed his carreer was over. But he was the Lieberman of this ticket - don't make some kind of hero out of him. He brought NOTHING to this "two Johns from senate who voted for war" deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
52. He is out of a job right now
He didn't run for reelection for his Senate seat. Kerry still has four years to go in his term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
venus Donating Member (527 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
60. Huh? He LOST! Why anger. Stupid thread. Teresa
was there along with Kerry's entire family. Apparently you didn't watch the speech. Edwards didn't appear ANGRY to me either. What's your point? To disrupt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #60
64. I watched part of both speeches. Edwards seemed
Edited on Wed Nov-03-04 08:13 PM by saracat
impassioned and willing to continue the fight.What I saw of Kerry were genuine smiles and a weird happy reaction from the crowd of supporters. That is what I saw. I believed Edwards, but I wanted to vomit when I heard Kerry tell us to "unite" and support Bush.I turned the TV off it has not been on since and no news channel will be for quite some time if at all.I am sorry this seems disruptive to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #60
74. He was Not angry!


He was reading from a prepared text so that he would be less emotional.

I heard him clearly talk about counting the votes.

Maybe I'm wrong but I think it was a code in that message.

Hope I am right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #74
76. i feel the same way, maybe he knows something we dont
but will soon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doodlebugs4kerry Donating Member (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
66. Edwards is pissed ....
... 'cause he don't have a damn job to go back to! He's what cost us the election! No experience. Seen as a weakling here in the south. Plus he's biding his time. He thinks he can get the nomination in 2008 w/ Hillary as his VP! The man is a freaking joke! John Kerry carried Edwards! He needs to hang his head in shame for costing us (& JFK) the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prayin4rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
68. I love Edwards. I really do.
I can't even engage too much in the being pissed at Kerry because of how much I like Edwards. That guy is all heart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert Oak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
71. Kerry was decimated, crushed, destroyed
His anger will re-appear but you could tell he was toast and I am
sure is going to go through some period of blaming himself.

Give the guy a break. He got beat because these idiots in America
identify with the Candidate personally.

They can see themselves busting gay heads with Bush, going to church
with Bush and so on.

They just slit their own throats financially, but what do they care....
they have just purchased their latest image...

just like a Big Mac...lots of chemical taste and little nutrition.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JFW Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
73. reply
yep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southsideirish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-03-04 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
79. I picked up on that, too. I think the sharp little lawyer from NC had
an ace up his sleeve (important information re: Fla and/or Ohio) but ole "goo goo" wanted to carve out his niche in HISTORY by being a "good loser."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Election Reform Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC