G20 officer questioned on suspicion of Ian Tomlinson manslaughter ...

[LeftishBrit]

Second postmortem into G20 death finds Ian Tomlinson suffered abdominal haemorrhage rather than heart attack.

www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/apr/17/ian-tomlinson-g20-manslaughter-questioning -

[Frau Schmidt]

1. How can you trust anything they say?

1 April 2009: Ian Tomlinson dies around 19:30.

1 April: At 23:36, the Met says protesters
attacked them while police fought to save him.

2 April: Newspapers lead with that angle.
IPCC will "assess the circumstances."

3 April: Post mortem: Tomlinson died of a heart attack.

3 April: The Guardian tells City of London Police
it has photos of Tomlinson lying at the feet
of riot police.

4 April: City of London Police say
Tomlinson died of natural causes.

5 April: Guardian publishes photos and
testimony that Tomlinson was hit by police.

5 April: IPCC says Guardian has upset
the family. Tells journalists there is
"nothing in the story."

6 April: IPCC confirms that Tomlinson had
contact with the police. It appeals for witnesses.

7 April: At 2 am, Guardian receives video
showing Tomlinson was hit by an officer.
Publishes it that afternoon on its website.

8 April: IPCC removes police from the inquiry.

9 April: IPCC suspends the officer in question.
A second post mortem is conducted.
IPCC says no CCTV cameras near the assault.

14 April: CCTV cameras near the assault
found by Evening Standard.
Second post mortem: Tomlinson died from an
abdominal haemorrhage, not heart attack.