all emphases below mine.
Would not the obvious and objective question from the media be:
“Ok, what corruption are you talking about in relation to your Liberal opponents, specifically?”Well lookee there.
"YOUR LIBERAL OPPONENTS". Date: January 8.
Now, let's look at the famous question to Jack Layton from the wide-eyed innocent in the audience on Your Turn:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=190&topic_id=10597&mesg_id=10597Harper_is_Bush
Thu Jan-19-06 07:04 PM
Layton's lying exposed in CBC "your turn"!!
... Given these facts, how do you justify the constant repetition of the word "corruption" in reference to your Liberal opponents, and do you feel that false accusations like that harm our democratic process?
Huh.
"YOUR LIBERAL OPPONENTS". Date: January 17.
Great minds, eh? What an interesting turn of phrase they did come up with all independent-like.
Damn, I guess I was right.
iverglas
Fri Jan-20-06 02:37 PM
11. sez you
... But if you are going to tell me that "his Liberal opponents" means PAUL MARTIN or any other particular individual you might want somebody to think it means, then I'm going to ask you why you (and the plant in the CBC audience, and anybody else who might be saying or wanting to say it) doesn't just SAY "PAUL MARTIN".
THE PLANT. The Liberal Party shill.
The talking points do seem to have been taken to heart by the shills, but they just couldn't get traction, could they?
Some people do just keep tryin and tryin, though.