Hey, all:
Those who are wondering about "blue" vs. "red" states can see something a little less primary by going here:
http://www.boingboing.net/2004/11/03/purple_haze.htmlI also note that a link was provided to a USA today article that breaks the voting down by counties.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselections/vote2004/countymap.htm"Bill" wrote: "In contrast to your purple map, USA Today has published a country map broken down by county that shows where each party won. It's an even more depressing sea of red than the full US map, but clearly shows how the city folk liked the Dems and the rural folk liked the Reps this time around. Population difference is slight, land area difference is huge."
I'd like to point out the part of this sentence: "clearly shows how the city folk liked the Dems and the rural folk liked the Reps this time around. Population difference is slight, land area difference is huge."
Actually, that's not true for Southwestern Wisconsin, or western Wisconsin along the Mississippi River. The largest cities in this area are: Madison (about 200,000), Dubuque, IA (pop. 58,000), and La Crosse, WI (pop. 58,000). While those are large cities for this area, many people are still living and working in the small towns. The Republicans concentrated a *lot* of time and energy to the areas in Wisconsin along the Mississippi. They still lost most of the counties. Additionally, northern Wisconsin is shown as having gone Democratic. That's waaay out in the country. So, not everyone who lives in the country thinks only of God, guns & gays.
Yes, WI went Dem, but it's good to know that it wasn't only due to Madison and Milwaukee. And I'm happy to see that, as I thought, the 2 counties that I hang out in are blue.