Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Enviro Groups to Sue Coal Plant Touted by Texas as Permitting Success

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Texas Donate to DU
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 09:25 AM
Original message
Enviro Groups to Sue Coal Plant Touted by Texas as Permitting Success
In the wake of U.S. EPA's rejection of a Texas program that permits the state's largest air pollution sources, environmental groups have challenged a coal-fired power plant that Gov. Rick Perry (R) had hailed as a symbol of the value of the state's "flexible" permitting program.

When federal regulators rejected the Texas permitting program on June 30, it raised the pitch of an already unusually noisy fight between state and federal regulators. Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott (R) sued EPA last month over the agency's rejection of one air permitting program, and with the publication of the agency's final decision (pdf) on the "flexible" permitting program in today's Federal Register, the door is open for another legal challenge from the Lone Star State.

Environmentalists are trying to drive home their point, as well. Three advocacy groups -- the Environmental Integrity Project, the Texas Campaign for the Environment, and Environment Texas -- warned one of Texas' largest power plants today that they intend to file suit over about 10,000 alleged violations of federal air regulations.

The notice (pdf) was sent to the Lower Colorado River Authority, a publicly owned utility that runs the 1,641-megawatt Fayette Power Project near La Grange, Texas.

"In Texas, air pollution permits are flexible alright -- flexible enough to allow coal-fired power plants like the Fayette plant to avoid tougher federal emission limits, violate the weaker substitute standards offered by the Texas regulators, and short-change Texas taxpayers by failing to pay fees that are supposed to be used to improve air quality," said Ilan Levin, a senior attorney for the Environmental Integrity Project, in a statement today.

http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2010/07/15/15greenwire-enviro-groups-to-sue-coal-plant-touted-by-texas-8391.html


Environmental groups say they will sue LCRA over Fayette power plant

In an early sign of how federal disapproval of a state air pollution program will filter down to Central Texas, three environmental groups said Thursday that they would sue the Lower Colorado River Authority over its operations of a coal-fired power plant near La Grange.

The environmental groups say the Fayette Power Project failed to upgrade its pollution controls as it ramped up its capacity, dodging federal regulations.

The nonprofit river authority, which owns the plant jointly with the City of Austin and supplies wholesale power to cities and electric cooperatives, said the groups' claims are based on faulty methodology and faulty conclusions.

The environmental groups were emboldened to threaten suit by the decision at the end of June to disapprove the state's flexible permitting program, which sets overall emission caps for facilities, rather than particular limits on emissions from a single boiler. Fayette operates under such a permit, and federal regulators have said the program is too lax.

"Having very clear standards now gives us the foundation and support to move forward with this case," said Luke Metzger, the executive director of Environment Texas. The plant is "one of the biggest polluters in Central Texas, and many of our members are in Central Texas, so it's a natural target."

Environment Texas joined the Environmental Integrity Project and the Texas Campaign for the Environment in filing the notice to sue.

http://www.statesman.com/news/local/environmental-groups-say-they-will-sue-lcra-over-805610.html


I hope they sue the pants off those polluters. I'm sick to death of watching our air quality in Central Texas go down year after year.

Refresh | +3 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sierra Club and Environment TX also suing ExxonMobil
Edited on Fri Jul-16-10 11:40 AM by sonias
Lone Star Chapter Sierra Club Press Release 7/7/10

Wednesday, July 7, 2010

Lone Star Chapter Sierra Club
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Luke Metzger, Environment Texas
Neil Carman, Sierra Club 512-299-5776
Josh Kratka, Esq., NELC 617-747-4333

EXXONMOBIL FACES CLEAN AIR ACT LAWSUIT FOR VIOLATIONS AT NATION’S LARGEST REFINERY


Texas Families Deserve Clean Air
Pollution harms children.



Groups Allege Over 10 Million Pounds of Illegal Pollution From Baytown, TX Complex, In Excess of Already Weak “Flexible Permit” Limits
Benzene, Butadiene, Sulfur Dioxide, Nitrogen Oxides, Carbon Monoxide Among Pollutants at Issue in Case

(HOUSTON) – Sierra Club and Environment Texas announced today that they intend to sue ExxonMobil Corporation in federal court for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at its Baytown refinery and chemical plant complex. The suit would be the third case filed by the two environmental groups since 2008 to stop illegal air emissions arising from so-called “upset” events at facilities along the Houston Ship Channel.

ExxonMobil’s Baytown complex operates under controversial “flexible permits” issued by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, which have been criticized by environmental groups and the U.S. EPA for failing to set sufficiently strict emission limits (among other deficiencies). The groups claim that, despite having such lax permits, ExxonMobil’s persistent violations of those permits have nonetheless resulted in the release of more than ten million pounds of excess air pollutants over the past five years, including toxic chemicals such as benzene and 1,3-butadiene.

“Exxon has had the benefit of running the country’s largest oil refinery under air pollution rules so weak they wouldn’t be allowed in any other state,” explained Neil Carman, Clean Air Program Director for Sierra Club’s Lone Star Chapter. “Yet the Baytown refinery has still released more excess pollutants – above and beyond its flexible permit limits – than any other Texas refinery we’ve looked at, including BP’s.”


Glad to see the groups getting some traction on our environment. :applause: :applause: :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. No,kidding...read this site if you have the time...
some of my county's party members belong

Downwinders at Risk
http://www.downwindersatrisk.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. and Toxic Texas website-you can search your own area
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Texas Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC