Daily Texan 6/30/10Students still split over Simkins hall debate
Second forum gathers feedback on renaming Simkins dormitory(snip)
Some students were concerned that if Simkins Hall, which was named after a former Ku Klux Klan member and UT law professor, is renamed, it will start a frenzy on campus to rename all the buildings and statues that commemorate people who do not hold ideals that conform to modern standards.
"If we do change the name of the dorm, we need to draw a very clear line and say that this is why what Simkins did was too far, and he shouldn’t be honored with a building named after him," former Student Government representative Alex Ferraro said. "This campus is full of buildings and statues that are tributes to people who were not consistent with the values that we have now."
I would tell Alex if the campus is full of buildings and statutes who were named after people like Simkins - it's time for them all to go. Why protect them? The U.S. is all about re-writing history. Why stop at Universities?
It's one thing to have a hall/display etc and clearly mark it "Confederate exhibit" or something like that so that it is a historical display, it's quite another thing to keep a position of honor as a building name throughout history.
Actually UT makes a lot of money selling building names. It was always supposed to be reserved for people that were deceased. But in 1995 the University "sold" the rights to the Biology Building to
http://www.utwatch.org/corporations/freeportfiles/texan-951117d.html">Jim Bob Moffett of Freeport-McMoRan fame. Hopefully future generations will see the error of that honor too and rename that building as well. For now the money Moffett "endowed" the university with was quickly rewarded.
:shrug: