And thankfully, it seems like both parties are finally wising up to it. I just saw this story in the Dallas Morning News yesterday:
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/042010dnmethoa.3b0fe7b.htmlHOAs used to have lots of GOP lawmakers in their hip pockets, because they were closely tied to suburban developers. However, since most GOPers want to protect property rights (at least in theory), and their constituents are telling them these stories, many are starting to come the homeowners' way.
Homeowners associations used to be a good thing to have, and in some cases they still are. In our neighborhood, with homes from the 1960s, we have a voluntary HOA that does neighborhood watch, organizes activities for kids, etc. It's cheap and fosters a sense of community. The ones mentioned in this article are nothing but thug-enablers, allowing a small minority of people (who often have nothing else better to do) to dictate what others can do with their property.
I'll admit that I don't know the best way to fix the problem -- do we really need legislation giving a laundry list of what HOAs can and can't do (e.g., they can force you to take cars out of your lawn, but can't tell you what color of tape to use on your garden hose)? Taking away their foreclosure power would be a good step, though.