(Will also be posted in Election Reform News when all my articles finish loading.)
snip
That paper, "What the TAKS Test can Teach Us about Our Students," should be required reading for the Legislature's blue-ribbon panel that is studying whether Texas should revise its school accountability system with its heavy reliance on the controversial Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills.
anip
Although Jefferies' paper is a critique of the TAKS test, his research didn't start out as an attempt to assess the test. It began when he decided to use questions from the previous year's test (made available by the Texas Education Agency) at the beginning of a semester to see how much his students knew.
snip
So the next semester he gave students an open-ended test on the same subject matter before giving them the TAKS questions.
Only seven in 10 knew what the Miranda warning was. Only 35 percent could say why freedom of speech was important, and 30 percent understood that King George's abusive use of the military led to the constitutional provision making the president commander in chief.
As he looked closer at the TAKS questions, Jefferies saw that they were structured in such a way that the question suggested the answer.
More:
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/casey/5962608.htmlMy comment: It is extremely hard to write a good multiple choice questions. Apparently the TAKS people are not exactly at the expert level in this skill.
Example bad multiple choice test - if you use your test-taking skills, I bet you can make 100:
1. The fribbled breg will minter best with an
1. mors
2. ignu
3. derst
4. sortar
More (although not the original 10-question quiz we used in the Navy - haven't been able to find that yet):
http://tombrandt.net/blog/2007/08/08/franzipanics/#comment-320Edited for traditional stupid typo.