Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'View Tax' Triggers Revolt in Rural New Hampshire

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » New Hampshire Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 07:05 AM
Original message
'View Tax' Triggers Revolt in Rural New Hampshire
'View Tax' Triggers Revolt in Rural New Hampshire

November 01, 2005 — By Katharine Webster, Associated Press
ORFORD, N.H. — The one-room cabin David Bischoff built in a cow pasture three years ago has no electricity, no running water, no phone service and no driveway.

What it does have is a wide-open view of nearby hills and distant mountains -- which makes it seven times more valuable than if it had no view, according to the latest townwide property assessment. He expects his property taxes to shoot up accordingly.

Bischoff and other Orford residents bitterly call that a "view tax," and they are leading a revolt against it that has gained support in many rural towns in New Hampshire.

State officials say there is no such thing as a "view tax" -- it is a "view factor," and it has always been a part of property assessments. The only change is that views have become so valuable in some towns that assessors are giving them a separate line on appraisal records.
(snip/...)

http://www.enn.com/today.html?id=9140
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. The problem in NH is its use of RET to fund the state government.
Property values most certainly are affected by location. DUH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
pokercat999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. What would happen if the govt was required to purchase
the property at the assessed value, if demanded by the owner? My guess is that 100% would not sell as the assessed value is still far below the market value. That still doesn't address the problem of long time owners that are not well off but have inherited very valuable land. Why couldn't these taxes be based on the value of the land plus the ability of the land owner to pay?

Oh, that would be a "leftist" position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. I had the same on property in MA years ago.
They said ocean views enhanced the value of the home. I appealed it and they rolled it back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
blackcatpgh Donating Member (217 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. i hate this kinda shit
sounds like a good way to get lower income people who are willing to live without "necessities" like running water & electricity to be priced (via taxes) off of land that can then be subdivided into mcmansion developments -- which will, of course, provide higher tax revenues.

i'd lump this one in with the awful eminent domain debacle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
5. Most property..
.... is taxed based on VALUE. A view would certainly enhance the value, as a lack of utilities would diminish it.

Most tax appraisal authorities try very hard to keep the assessed value a few percent below market value. Because the "ok if it's worth that much buy it for that" argument has been used successfully many many times, I've used it myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
toopers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-01-05 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. Why aren't they using comparable sales in the area?
That is the only real way to determine the value of a property. This is rediculous. I hope the NH'ers do revolt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
maxanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. it doesn't matter
we use property taxes to fund our state government, because we don't have an income or sales tax. As a result, we're always looking for new fees and boondoggles to keep the money trickling in, so we don't need to ask the millionaires to pay their fair share.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » New Hampshire Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC