Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What were they investigating Matt Blunt for?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Missouri Donate to DU
 
ogsball Donating Member (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-29-07 10:43 PM
Original message
What were they investigating Matt Blunt for?

From the NY Times editorial about the questioning of Mr. Sampson today. . .

The senators questioning Mr. Sampson pointed to a troubling pattern: many of the fired prosecutors were investigating high-ranking Republicans. He was asked if he was aware that the fired United States attorney in Nevada was investigating a Republican governor, that the fired prosecutor in Arkansas was investigating the Republican governor of Missouri, or that the prosecutor in Arizona was investigating two Republican members of Congress.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
galloglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. They were investigating his selling of Revenue Offices
to political cronies.

Specifically, the sale of a revenue Office to the wife of US Attorney Todd Graves, brother of Rep. Sam Graves of MO.

The untold nasty backstory is this.

In Missouri, as in many of the other cases of fired US Attorney's, the problem stems from the inability (or refusal) of the US Attornies to prosecute what Rove and Bush have previously termed "Voter Fraud" (you know, illegal immigrants sneaking across the border and traveling 1000 miles to vote Democratic, while risking five years in the penitentiary, while impersonating your dead Grandfather??).

They (Bush and Rove) are now calling this type act (which has never happened, BTW) by the name of "Election Fraud".

Of course, you and I know the difference.

"Voter Fraud" is where some numbskull tries to vote in two different precincts, risking a five year stretch, and if they are successful they manage to get one whole vote extra for their candidate.

"Election Fraud" is when a person or persons, unknown, attempt to alter the vote counting process by adding, subtracting, switching votes, or by means of disenfranchisement of voters, to deny votes being cast, in order to alter what would otherwise be the honest results of an election.

So, next time the GOP lies to you about voting (say, like, "Touchscreens are safe, and help the disabled!!"), insist on "truth in labeling" of those lies!

Just remember.

"Voter Fraud" = "Voter Fraud", and is carried out by dummies, who are sent up the river.

"Election Fraud" = "Election Fraud", and is carried out by elected officials and their employees who, even if they are caught redhanded, are never prosecuted.


Ohh, yeah. What does this have to do with Mr. Sampson?? Well, as hatchet man for Gonzo, he had to identify the US Attorneys who were prosecuting "Voter Fraud" while ignoring "Election Fraud".

And since Missouri's big attempt to quash the Democrats votes hung on Senate Bill 1014 (the Photo Voter ID law) of 2006, wherein those without IDs (about 180,000) had to go to the Bureau of Motor Vehicles for IDs (freshly sold to Blunt's political cronies at bargain basement prices), it could have been that those newly private BMVs would not have stayed open late, or hired extra employees, to allow the extra 180,000 voters to get IDs.

And who would make that decision (hint: the wife of the the Western US attorney, and sister-in-law of Sam Graves) and who would benefit (hint: NOT the Democrats)?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
potisok Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. A good resource place on Missouri Politics
http://www.firedupmissouri.com/ there were several articles concerning Matt Blunt misdeeds and missteps. Remember blunt is not sharp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Roy Temple is a DUer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
potisok Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thanks for information proud2Blib
I have read his blog and commentaries, was not aware of his DU member status. Should have guessed though. Not much (correction nothing) on the news about the Missouri State Legislature HCR 46 to impeach Bush, saw it on DU or would have been unaware.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-30-07 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. He doesn't post much
but he has been here now and again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Missouri Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC