Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I hear from my b-i-l, that you guys passed a cloning amendment...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Missouri Donate to DU
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 04:27 PM
Original message
I hear from my b-i-l, that you guys passed a cloning amendment...
Now, how did he get that confused? Stem cell research is the same as cloning? What kind of kool aid are they handing out in St.Louis? This is the kind of willful ignorance we are continually up against. I know he was fully informed of the differences, he just choses to embrace the propaganda. We did laugh at him, though. He was grasping at straw to save the spin based party.

Anyhoo, congratulations Missouri!
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
wildflowergardener Donating Member (863 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-13-06 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. cloning
that's what the opponants were saying - vote no to human cloning.

Meg
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-14-06 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yup, it was all propaganda
the law specifically bans cloning, but all the negative ads said "we cant allow cloning! vote no!"

then there were the ads that claimed poor women would sell their eggs and end up with medical problems from it, even thought the law specifially bans buying and selling of human eggs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
xmas74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-02-06 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Interesting how it
was fine for women to donate their eggs for fertility reasons before but they made a huge deal out of egg donation when they wanted to argue stem cell.

That was one of my big arguments just a few weeks back-why would it be ok for one and not the other? (I know-it banned buying and selling for research). The big argument was why was it ok to supposedly render a woman infertile for donating eggs for a couple to freeze indefinitely but not ok for that same woman to use them for research w/ an assumed risk of infertility to herself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Missouri Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC