|
Edited on Thu Mar-31-05 01:32 PM by Warpy
although there are CEOs of the larger insurance and for profit hospital conglomerates whose salaries are at the level of embezzlement.
Rather, what's driving health care costs is first and foremost the need to suck profit out of a system that was never meant to be in the marketplace.
That need is expressed in health facilities trying to be all things to all people and constantly buying the newest and most expensive technology (while skimping on staff). This results in a ridiculous duplication of enormously expensive services within a single market, and drives costs. Much of that equipment stands idle much of the time, and generates only a depreciation allowance on the facility's taxes.
Another thing is the Byzantine paperwork from competing insurance plans and the need to cope with mutiple bureacracies. Fully fifty cents of every dollar a hospital gets goes to paperwork.
Greed has certainly factored into this, especially at the level of the drug companies, who seek to sell their drugs to people who can't prescribe them and probably don't need them by carefully worded and expensive TV commercials that medicalize a lot of very normal phenomena. Insurance plans all complain they're being squeezed to death between drug costs and stockholders' expectations, and this is a massive drive to increased medical costs.
If you want less of any commodity, cap its cost to the public. If you want more of it, subsidize it. It's always worked that way. Right now, the tax laws subsidize the very things we should be discouraging: overbuying of unnecessary equipment, out of control CEO pay packages, and writeoffs for things like advertising.
Until and unless we stop treating illness like a consumer decision, this will continue. Until and unless we recognize the need for labor in a labor intensive field, we'll see technology favored over people.
And until the DLC is out of power, none of this will be addressed.
|