Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No discussion here about the DM corruption and scandal?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Places » Iowa Donate to DU
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 11:39 PM
Original message
No discussion here about the DM corruption and scandal?
Ramona Cunningham and all the others and Cynthia Eisenhauer and Mike Tramontina and others called in to testify.Doesn't look good. Looks like the people involved in this are in rather a picturesque debacle. Not sure of Vilsack's people are going to go unscathed either. I suppose the theory is that if Delay got brought down by misappropriated $$ then the same can befall corrupt Democrats. Yepsen and Borsellino have had some good articles on this stuff (though I normally detest Yepsen it looks like this time he might have some legitimate targets).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. These are ALL Vilsack's people
Maybe that's why I've been hesitant to post. Every morning I open the paper and see yet another name I recognize as a Friend of Vilsack.

The DMR has the listing of 2005 salaries for all the State of Iowa employees. I realize that the scandal doesn't include payments to State employees, but have you looked at what Vilsack's friends make as compared to even what he makes?

My fear is that this is just the tip of the iceberg in Vilsack's career-long providing for those who got him there and we're going to see a REAL mess ahead of us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I was never really sold on Vilsack anyway
and began a more active disdain when he signed on to the "teacher comp" bill which the teachers (who had gone all out for him) didn't want. He feels he has to SOMETHING to put on his career resume, however pernicious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm not Vilsack fan. Obviously, I won't get on the Blouin band wagon
for Good Old Tom.

I worry how this will play out for the people who didn't get the huge salaries, who weren't a Friend of Tom. He'll take out or take down all the good, clean Democrats just to protect himself.

What? You think he's going to say, "Yeah, I paid all my buddies truck loads of tax-payer cash as a thanks for getting me into the Governor's office". Right, now that he wants to be President Vilsack he'll sell all those buddies out (he needs national cash now, not this piddly Iowa cash - and anyway he's gonna win the Iowa Caucuses didn't you hear?).

This is just rotten.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rambis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Vilsack is,was toast
Edited on Tue Apr-11-06 04:27 PM by Rambis
He has no political career outside of Iowa. There is a backlash against our state for choosing kerry (not saying it is right or wrong) .
There is no way the Dems will nominate a X governor from a small midwestern state like Iowa to be president.
I Loved Clinton but he was the downfall of the democratic party and the last governor from a small state that will get a chance to be elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU9598 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. IWD
I think by the time this is over, it won't be just Democrats. I think a lot of this stuff was going on long before Vilsack ever thought of becoming Governor. There are a lot of people who may yet become involved. And, let's not forget, the Federal Department of Labor cleared these salaries for the past three years. If the Feds who provided the money had no problem with the pay, why should the state?

I don't think this has much legs, but if the Repubs keep digging, they will dig down the corruption all the way to the Branstad and perhaps Ray administrations - IWD was reorganized into its present form under Branstad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I have to agree with you there
Edited on Wed Apr-12-06 10:50 AM by Debi
I think there is always political payback to a sitting Governor's friends.

Vilsack's mistake may have been to keep up Branstad's traditions (and adding $$ to the sweet salaries) rather than 'uncovering' the buddy-system that had been going on for so long under republican leadership. He should have cleaned house, put his people in there with reasonable salaries (How many people make more that the Governor now?) and weeded out the big spenders.

As for the Federal Department of Labor clearing salaries - can anyone say $600.00 toilet seats & $400.00 hammers? Who the hell trust the Federal Government to keep an eye on Iowa? Harkin didn't seem too thrilled that he had helped provide $1.4 million just to pay three salaries.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Crony System
I know Cynthia Eisenhauer was head of IWD in the Branstad Era since my wife was and is a member of our regional Workforce Commission (with no salary). She was simply kept on, as you indicate, amd moved to another position. Her husband is a judge I believe. I'm just using her as an example of how little the power structure changed in DM after the inimitable Vilsacks arrived in Terrace Hill. Tramontina has been a Dem apparatchik in DM for decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. So maybe the power structure of the statehouse needs to get a good
shaking up :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-12-06 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. It very badly does. It needs fresh blood
and therewith a general rejuvenation. I would think we could insist on an end to cronyism and children of loyal party members getting nice posts in DM. There is aan activist in Dubuque for instance whose son effortlessly got a DM job. Shouldn't have stuff like that since it also blocks the way for younger people who are outside the power structure from having an input. Another issue is the effect of the financial power structure wanting to have the same old comfortable see-no-evil bureaucrats to deal with. One case in point is that Ankeny land deal which involved, again, Vilsack's political and financial buddies like Bill Knapp and others. And everywhere always and at all times one always comes across people like Michael Gartner and others who are trying to make all thr major decisions for the state universities and so forth. We need to disconnect wealth from sociopolitical influence. These geniuses have screwed up our educational systems, our environment, our economy and our morale as a state. Plus the idiotic top-down schemes these satraps keep coming up with like that Rain Forest idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Iowa Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC