Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Budget office has released the proposed cuts if C fails...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » Colorado Donate to DU
 
pointsoflight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-22-05 03:56 PM
Original message
Budget office has released the proposed cuts if C fails...
The Office of State Planning and Budgeting has now sent a memo to the governor with the cuts that have been proposed for 2006-07, should C fail. It's not good folks.

http://www.unbossed.com/UBdownloads/2006-07%20Program%20Prioritization.pdf

Here's the overview:

In working with the Departments, we attempted to prioritize cuts so that the core missions of the departments were maintained. However, as you will note in the summaries below, if Referendum C fails, significant cuts across State government are unavoidable. Basically, the status quo menu of services and protections provided by the State are incompatible with the “ratchet down” provision of TABOR. While some of the cuts in recent years may not have affected the general public, this subsequent round of reductions would diminish public safety, and result in higher tuition for families and reduced consumer protection and services to the elderly.

...Given the fundamental impracticality and the public safety impacts of the cuts in Corrections, it is likely that a mininimum 20 percent cut in Higher Education, as well as other cuts not proposed herein would be necessary to balance the FY 2006-07 budget if Referendum C fails.

The full list of cuts includes:

--Eliminate State Support for the Colorado Indigent Care Program

--Eliminate Medicare Coinsurance and Deductibles

--At least a 20% cut for the Department of Higher Education, amounting to $119.6 million....we project that resident undergraduate tuition for a four-year degree would increase by at least $988, or $3,952 for a full degree....it is possible that some rural community colleges or state colleges could close.

--In either scenario of cuts, there would be no additional funding for the additional 1000 inmates expected next year. With a 10% cut the State would have to take the drastic step of capping the inmate population and releasing a number of inmates in order to maintain the capped population. Meanwhile, over-crowding of existing facilities would cause safety concerns for employees. With a 20% cut, the Department would eliminate educational and other programs in addition to the measures above. Since the Department would no longer provide educational programs (primarily for inmates to attain a GED) and would eliminate all drug and alcohol treatment, mental health, and vocational rehabilitation programs, released inmates would be less prepared for success outside of prison.

--Services such as Meals on Wheels, transportation assistance, etc. would be eliminated or reduced. Many of these services allow poor seniors to remain in their private residences.

--Eliminate Vehicle Emissions Program

--Eliminate Instant Criminal Background Check

--In order to reach the total cuts displayed...the Department would permanently close 11 state parks and seasonally closing 15 parks. Fees could not be raised to offset the reductions, because they count against the TABOR limit as well.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. The link doesn't work for me
Did you post the entire article? I'd like to email it to a friend. So I won't need another url if this is the complete article. thx!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
pointsoflight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Here are a couple of links....
The link I included before was a link to a pdf file, so that may have been the problem. What I included was just a summary of a several page report.

Here are links to a couple of newspaper articles that also summarize the report:

http://www.gazette.com/display.php?id=1311437&secid=1
http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_3137176
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
quantum500 Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-25-05 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Good!
We need to cut the fat!! I wish the federal government was regulated with a tabor amendment!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Welcome to DU!
:D




:eyes:




:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
pointsoflight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-05 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yeah, cut fat.
Release prisoners because you can't afford to hold them. Dramatically increase tuition so that those who aren't weathy can't go to college. Let roads fall apart, driving away business, hurting growth, and causing the repair bill to be even larger later. Close state parks. Remove services for older adults, such that an independent living situation is no longer an option.

Yeah, cut that fat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Hi quantum500!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
SlipperySlope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. Not to be picky...
Isn't this being worded in a way that is 180 degress away from reality, in order to make a political point?

The status quo is that C&D have not passed, and that TABOR is in effect. If C&D are passed, then these programs should have their budgets increased accordingly.

Instead, this press release is phrased as if these programs already have this money, and voters are going to do something to take the money away from them.

This is really dishonest, even if it is for a good cause. If C&D fail, the state still has more money than last year, and there is not "cut" to the overall budget.

Do we now live in a world where all sides lie, and we have to learn to read between the lines all the time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » Colorado Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC