Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Maglev: Vegas to DisneyLand - Governors agree to back fast train

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Places » California Donate to DU
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 03:10 AM
Original message
Maglev: Vegas to DisneyLand - Governors agree to back fast train
More discussion at the CA High-Speed Rail blog

http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2008/dec/22/governors-agree-back-fast-train/

Governors agree to back fast train
Trip between Vegas, Anaheim, Calif., could take only 86 minutes

Plans for maglev train like the one being tested in Japan in 2003 to give travelers between Las Vegas and Southern California another alternative to Interstate 15 may get a boost from a the economic stimulus plan.

By David McGrath Schwartz
Mon, Dec 22, 2008 (2 a.m.)

<snip>

Near the bottom of a news release detailing Gov. Jim Gibbons’ meeting last month with President-elect Barack Obama was the announcement that Gibbons and California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger had agreed to move ahead with the high-speed train project.

“Arnold and I agreed to jointly work together on the project,” said Gibbons, who is planning to travel to Sacramento to talk with Schwarzenegger about it.

<snip>

In June, Sen. Harry Reid, the Democratic majority leader, helped pass a bill that freed up $45 million for an environmental study of the route.

Obama and his advisers have been working with Congress on an economic stimulus package that would improve infrastructure and put people to work. The Washington Post on Friday put the size of the stimulus at $850 billion.

<snip>

Refresh | +1 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. COOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 02:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. if it helps bring jobs to the state, I say hell yeah!
and these would be good jobs as well


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. First priority should be commuter lines: (Reno?)-Sac-EastBay-SF, Stockton-Tracy-EastBay-SF
and whatever the SoCal equivalents would be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes, yes, yes. Existing lines need upgrades too.
BART needs more trains and parking lots. MUNI in San Francisco needs everything. Why are we spending billions on behalf of helping Nevada Casinos?

It's so nearsighted and dumb. So.... "Bush."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. High Speed Train..
Edited on Sat Dec-27-08 12:55 PM by AsahinaKimi
I thought it was supposed to Connect Los Angeles with San Francisco... now its going to Las Vegas?
O.o" -- what a disappointment. *cries*
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-29-08 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. This is in addition to the L.A./S.F. connection
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Oerdin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-31-08 05:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. This additional.
This is an additional line but one which they've been talking about for well over a decade and a half. Several studies have been done on this route but still it never gets built. The last I heard the company proposing this was demanding the state give them, free of charge, all the land needed plus land around it so the company could make development profits, the state refused, and the proposal fell apart. It's honestly cheaper just to have the government do it because if you get a private company to do it they'll demand 10X the cost in extra land because that's how they plan on turning a quick profit. The problem is that's even more expensive then just having the state do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-09 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I don't think an LA SF train would be successful.
Most of the trips back and forth are one or two day business trips. Air flights are 1 hour.
Unless the train can go 350 miles an hour it's not going to be a useful alternative to airplane flight.

Las Vegas is different. It's a vacation destination and if the trip took a 2 or 3 hours it would still be used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Places » California Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC