BWAHAHAHA, now the Freepers want Nader in the Debates!

[Walt Starr]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1232886/posts

To: crushelits
This is why Nader needs to be added to the debates immediately!



2 posted on 10/01/2004 12:25:27 PM PDT by LongsforReagan (Democrats =Girly Men)
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies >

[wryter2000]

1. Damn!

I fell of my chair laughing.

[MikeG]

4. Even my chair was laughing.

[TrustingDog]

10. LOL, Mike! gold!

[LTR]

2. That's fine

Let's bring in Badnarik or, even better, Peroutka.

[gratuitous]

3. They've always wanted Nader in the debates

Limits Stupidhead's time to look . . . stupid.

Also, they figure that Nader would tie Kerry up in knots and leave Stupidhead alone. I'm not sure if they're wrong on that score, but I wouldn't count on it. Ralph sometimes has some pretty sharp things to say about Republican policies, too. Sometimes.

[cheshire]

5. Bring it on. If Nadar is there they will have o show * all the time.

[maine_raptor]

6. Hey, They Own him, so why not bring in the second string? n/t

[ronnykmarshall]

7. They are FREAKING!!

One of my favorite lines from freeper ville was: Kerry broke the rules. No more debates!

[mumon]

8. Yeah, put Nader in ....

Nader comes across in his TV interviews as particularly unbalanced.

Putting him in the debates (which ain't gonna happen, because he's got no real support) would only enhance Kerry further at this point!

Bring it on!

[Rainbowreflect]

9. I love this one.

"you can find "democrat" in the dictionary. right between "Demagogue" and "demon"

And you can find republican in the dictionary right between reptile and repulse. What's the point?