Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What exactly is a "Pre-September 10" mentality??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
RevCheesehead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 11:03 AM
Original message
What exactly is a "Pre-September 10" mentality??
evidence that * knew something on Sept. 10?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. The implication is that everything changed after 9/11
and nations could attack each other at will, providing scant justification
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neomonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I think the gist of this
post is that he should have said pre-Sept 11...

In other words, Idiot King is saying that he knew "stuff" on September 10...oh no, it was just another faux pas...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevCheesehead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Exactly. It's either "Sept 10" OR "Pre-Sept.11" mentality
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neomonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. Ha ha I caught that too
And I firmly believe many of Idiot King's mis-speaks are actually Freudian in nature (ie, his persistent inability to say OBL when he means OBL and SH when he means SH).

Pre-Sept 10? What did you know Mr. (P)resident and when did you know it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. I bet Mark Crispin Miller had a
field day with that "debate"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. Naaaah-----Just Bush being Bush. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. I think that means that before 9/11
it wasn't OK to invade and occupy another country just because you felt like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
7. Going after brothels instead of terrorists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. Well according to my research--
Edited on Fri Oct-01-04 11:43 PM by DanSpillane
After the August 6th 2001 warning memo of the September attacks...

The information of an imminent attack was used to let Halliburton investors bail out before the general market fall, and to give a WMD contract to Halliburton on September 10th (instead of warning the people in towers).

In addition, a number of unknown persons near to the Bush administration leaked the news of the imminent attack to a select few in the financial markets, who made money on the deaths.

Moore and the September 11th Commission missed a few things. Alas, the unemployed like me have so much time to learn the truth, and share it with others.

Here's the latest chart (still in progress) of what went on:

 Add to my Journal Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Big kick
 Add to my Journal Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beaconess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. Don't know for sure, but probably involves clearing brush on a ranch for
months at a time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-01-04 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. IIRC,
"Bush sucks!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC