Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LA Times- Dean Is Ahead But Iowa Up For Grabs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 07:31 AM
Original message
LA Times- Dean Is Ahead But Iowa Up For Grabs
WASHINGTON — Howard Dean has established a narrow advantage in the Iowa caucuses by amassing a solid lead among upscale voters while cutting into Missouri Rep. Dick Gephardt's support among blue-collar and union families, a new Times Poll found.

Barely a week before the Jan. 19 voting, Dean led Gephardt 30% to 23%, a difference just within the poll's margin of error. Massachusetts Sen. John F. Kerry, with 18%, remained within reach of Gephardt, while North Carolina Sen. John Edwards attracted 11%.

The survey also showed likely caucus voters were surprisingly fluid in their commitments to the candidates, even after months of intensive campaigning.

About 1 in 11 said they remain undecided in the race. More significantly, nearly 40% who express a preference say they could still switch before the caucuses. ~snip~


more: http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-poll11jan11,1,3764349.story?coll=la-home-headlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tedoll78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. Something big to remember:
This poll was taken BEFORE the Harkin announcement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. yes, that's mentioned in the article
<<The poll was completed before the latest controversy surrounding Dean, the release of a 2000 television interview in which he derided the caucuses as "dominated by special interests." It also was conducted before Sen. Tom Harkin, Iowa's most influential Democrat, endorsed Dean on Friday.>>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUexperienced Donating Member (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Poll was also before Dean's latest gaffes
"Iowa caucus is run by special interests and extremists."

"There is good and bad" in the terrorist group Hamas.

And the Gore remark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneQPublic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. "Gaffes" means "not PC by Washington Insider standards"
What makes Dean statements "Gaffes"? Are they inaccurate? No, just unpopular and unconventional. He's not saying all the same safe, bland, focus-group-tested statements that presidential candidates are supposed to utter.

-- He said "If you look at the caucuses system, they are dominated by the special interests in both parties.” Everyone knows it's true. Hell, every election system is dominated with special interests. So where's the fire?

-- About Hamas, he speculated that there “will probably be good and bad” if Hamas takes control over the Palestinian leadership, the good being "they may actually have to be more responsible and start negotiations." Is that untrue? How can it be, it's speculation about something that hasn't occurred.

-- About Gore, he said, “He has a lot of attributes, but… there are some things that I am concerned about. One of them is being quick on your feet. He is not.” I am as big an Al Gore fan as anyone, but let's face it, he did not respond quickly enough to the false charges and characterizations of him in the 2000 campaign.

It's just amazing. Everybody, the public and pundits alike, complains that politicians never say what they mean, but only speak in pre-packaged, politically expedient sound bites. Then along comes Howard Dean, who speaks his mind, no matter how un-PC or un-CW, and what do they do? They call it "Gaffes"!

What a steaming heap of BS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Worthy of it's own thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realdem Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Latest Gaffe? Four Years ago!
And it wasn't a gaffe. It was him speaking his mind based on what he knew at the time. It ain't pretty in hind sight, but far from a gaffe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. You got the first quote wrong.
But then so did the media. He mentioned nothing about Iowa--he did mention the caucus process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminflorida Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. He had to have Harkin....
just to slow the bleeding down...but why the hell was he bleeding in the first place? Who the hell is going to step in and stop him from bleeding a week before the November elections?

That's the question not only Iowa voters should be asking but the rest of the party as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. he's bleeding
because he and lieberman are the only ones with 'disapproval' ratings higher than Bush in the Gallup poll

Dean is right when he says he's not losing his core people - but he's not getting the undecideds either. Harkin's endorsement will help with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Dean's getting killed with a thousand paper cuts.
Everything he does or ever did is being spen against him.

Neither Bush nor Clark could handle a single week of this sort of smear storm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Imagine Chimp under this scrutiny.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevolutionStartsNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. undecideds in Iowa
I talked to countless ndecideds in Iowa, and Dean was on almost everyone's short list. It was Dean or Edwards or Dean or Kerry in almost every case.

I also learned that most don't pay attention to the media or the sniping, they are more concerned about the issues and about who can win.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. He's bleeding because the media, three DL Dems & Rove all have out
the knives.

And they still got nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
11. Not news
Dean's campaign has never considered Iowa anything BUT up for grabs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ramsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. That's exactly right
The Dean campaign never expected to be in this position. When I met him back in March 2003, he said that he'd be happy to be in the top three in Iowa and hopefully number 2 in New Hampshire.

Believe me, the campaign is ecstatic to even be a little bit ahead in the Iowa polls, much less way ahead in NH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
14. Wow. Interesting. Most still haven't decided? That's amazing,
this close to the caucus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
16. "40% who express a preference say they could still switch"
I agree with Sissy. This is very important. It could create a Dean blowout. He needs to manage expectations, but between Harkin's endorsement and the torrent of volunteers pouring in, Dean could make big BIG news in Iowa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. good points Bucky
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. And I'm sure that percentage is MUCH smaller for current Dean supporters.
Aren't y'all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedoll78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Yes.
Candy Crowley (I can't believe I'm quoting her!) says that she's noticed that Dean supporters are pretty solid in Iowa. If this is true, Dean is in really good shape. Undecideds will see Dean frolicking with Gore, Bradley, and Harkin for most of next week, and they're gonna flock. And this doesn't even take into account The Perfect Storm..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
21. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC