Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

when will the effect of the debates show up in the polls?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
pstokely Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 01:41 AM
Original message
when will the effect of the debates show up in the polls?
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bronco69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hopefully
as soon as Kerry gives bush* the red ass tonight! :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kevin881 Donating Member (429 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 03:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. 3 day lag minimum, I would say.
full effect 10 days later or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. Not for awhile ...
The full effects of the debate(s) will not be known immediately and perhaps will not be known at all except in hindsight, that is barring some major gaff on the part of one of the participants.

The reasons are multiple, but one of the more important is that the effect of the debates is a evolutionary process. Some people will be affected immediately, but probably not enough to be statistically significant, and whatever effect is immediately shown is likely to be misleading. However, the analysis of the debates that will come in the days afterward combined with the cumulative effects of this on public and private discussions will all have an impact that can't be measured specifically in the moment.

To take one example, the effect of the VP debate between Dan Quayle and Lloyd Bentsen was quickly realized and highly favorable to the Dukakis campaign. This was an extreme case due to Bentsen's largely irrelevant but highly charged "you're no Jack Kennedy" comment. Nearly everyone agreed Quayle lost the debate and lost it badly simply due to that. The polls reflected this, but in subsequent days, that reflection disappeared in the wake of other factors. One of these factors was the hammering in RW media of the basic idea that Bentsen's comment said little about the positions of the candidates and was really nothing but a symbolic jab. Within a week, Bentsen was seen by many has having unfairly picked on the younger Quayle in order to avoid addressing the issues. So, the eventual effect on the polls was negative.

In short, you'll know Nov. 3.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC