Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Evidence that Bush isn't even trying to stop Al-Qaida

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Heath.Hunnicutt Donating Member (454 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 12:46 PM
Original message
Evidence that Bush isn't even trying to stop Al-Qaida
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/192756_fbi28.html

FBI drops ball on terror-related tapes
Untranslated recordings piling up, others have been erased, report says

By ERIC LICHTBLAU
THE NEW YORK TIMES

WASHINGTON -- Three years after the Sept. 11 attacks, more than 120,000 hours of potentially valuable terrorism-related recordings have not yet been translated by linguists at the FBI, and computer problems may have led the bureau to systematically erase some al-Qaida recordings, according to a declassified summary of a Justice Department investigation that was released yesterday.

The report, released in edited form by Glenn Fine, the Justice Department's inspector general, found that the FBI still did not have the capacity to translate all the terrorism-related material from wiretaps and other intelligence sources and that the influx of new material had outpaced the bureau's resources.

..........................

So.... they have 120,000 hours of tape from over the last 3 years, and haven't even translated it. Just the listening to the tapes could take 60-full-time-employee-years. But that's nothing. We should be able to hire 6000 translators and get through all of these tapes in a year at most. It's been 3 years. What is going on?

Is the President so distracted by Saddam that he just isn't paying attention to the war on Al Qaida?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. well you know they fired all the gay translators
because we were security risks. Also can fire anyone anywhere with a "top secret" security clearance specifically for being gay.

That's our rocket scientist president for you! Now that we're not working for the U.S. government . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heath.Hunnicutt Donating Member (454 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. You were a fired gay translator?
Are you one of the people fired for being gay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. not a translator
but have been declined govt security clearance (and job offer requiring it)'because you aren't married, don't have a girlfriend, and live with another man'.

I guess that was shrub's backhanded way of creating jobs?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heath.Hunnicutt Donating Member (454 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes, when my friend who rooms with a man got his Background Investigation
Edited on Tue Sep-28-04 01:07 PM by Heath.Hunnicutt
They interviewed many of his friends. Now, this guy was unmarried, didn't have a girlfriend, and lived with another man.

As it happens, both of these guys were straight.

So, I'm sitting there before the convesation with the investigator, trying to imagine how I can steer the conversation away from my friend's actual weaknesses. Well, what do you know -- the only thing they asked me about was his sexual preference.

I finally had to tell them stories about him in college, and what the ladies had to say about him. They never asked me anything else; and this was in 1992.

What a country!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Actually
that was the Army intelligence translators who were fired, not the FBI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. yes but they were civilian employees just the same
and the reasons are identical. Gays are "a security risk", according to all branches of our government that require any form of security clearance. Nevermind that of the politicians caught with their pants down as a result of a foreign information gathering operation, 100% of them were men blackmailed for fucking a (female) prostitute.

It's all bullshit of course - the perception that gays are somehow physically or mentally "weaker" or less stable or more open to acts immorality and treason than anyone else. It's just a ploy to give some right wing closet case a hate-gasm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. They fired Sibel Edwards because she criticized the FBI
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. ask Jim Lehrer to ask Bush about this
newshour@pbs.org

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. Didn't SIbel Edmunds' boss have her ERASE her work at the end of each
workday?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. al CIAda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC