That was odd - Madonna story on Early Today

[Ilsa]

They mentioned that Madonna had bashed Bush in an email to her fans, saying he was worse than the threat of terrorism. But they never mentioned she had endorsed Wes Clark. I don't particularly want Clark associated with "Bush bashing" as they put it, but I find it interesting that they decided to skip the mention of Clark.

Any thoughts about our "liberal" media?

[Eric J in MN]

1. Was the whole story less than 10 seconds? If so, it's just brevity. If

Was the whole story less than 10 seconds? If so, it's just brevity. If they spent over a minute on the story, then it was intentional.

[neebob]

2. Oh, NOW she bashes Bush.

Isn't Madonna just so daring, writing an email to her fans. Sorry, I lost all respect for her when she changed her video. No idea why they left out that she endorsed Clark, except the person(s) who thought the Bush-"bashing" was a story didn't want people to know that part because then it would have been obvious it wasn't such a bold bush-bashing move.

[MarianJack]

3. Early Today

I thought that their old anchor, nanette hansen, was just awful in her near orgasmic adoration of the halliburton administration. I don't have a read on the new anchor yet, but I can't imagine it being much different. They were probably trying to ignite another "Dixie Chicks" furor.

The "guddammm libril mejia" is HOT to get pres. moron re-selected. We have our work cut out for us, no matter who the nominee is, but I still feel that this election is winnable.