Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Only One Candidate Has a Plan: UN in, US out of Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dpbrown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 02:23 PM
Original message
Only One Candidate Has a Plan: UN in, US out of Iraq
Only one candidate for President has a plan to get the UN in and the US out of Iraq, to bring in UN peacekeepers and to bring our troops home.

View this new Flash animation by Eric Blumrich.

http://www.kucinich.us/animation-new.php

Fear Ends
Hope Begins
Kucinich 2004
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OpenMindedDem Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. what country does the majority of UN Peacekeepers come from??
Good plan if it works...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Pakistan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. has the most as of Nov 2003
but no majority

Here are leaders in descending order

Pakistan
Bangladesh
Nigeria
India
Ghana
Nepal
Uruguay
Kenya
South Africa
Jordan
Ukraine

http://www.un.org/Depts/dpko/dpko/contributors/November2003Countrysummary.pdf


Lots of good information about UN peacekeeping here . . .
http://www.un.org/Depts/dpko/dpko/home.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Canada, India, Pakistan, France, US are among the leaders
so no, it won't completely end US involvement, but its a shite side better than keeping it almost solely us
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
el_gato Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. how u.s out and u.n. out!

let the iraqis take care of thier own country

wow that's a novel idea: Self Determination

that country has been suffering from efforts of outside control for a 100 years now

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Draven Donating Member (76 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Great video!
Eric Blumrich has a lot of great videos out there. I like the "I Hate Republicans" one the best! :thumbsup:

PS: Kucinich is my main-man for the presidency! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. cool
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. Nope, but the other is a republican! LOL!
Edited on Fri Jan-09-04 02:40 PM by BlueEyedSon
this guy says he would have us out of Iraq in 90 days (and UN in):
http://johnbuchanan.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wingnut Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. The U.N. ran like scared rabbits
when attacked one time.

Sorry, but they are incompetent at 'peace keeping'.

We're stuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. hahahhahahaha
one time the UN ran like scared rabbits.

no mention of where. no mention of when. no mention of the conditions of combat. no mention of all the succesful UN peacekeeping missions.

with that kind of reasoning we sure are stuck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corporatewhore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. While i like it that DK wants to get the Us out..........
Edited on Fri Jan-09-04 03:03 PM by corporatewhore
I am not so sure that putting the UN in charge is the best thing to do because they imposed sanctions in iraq which killed around 1.5 million iraqis.With good reason they have little reason to trust the UN and the us even less two wars an occupation and we gave them saddam .I think that we need to get the troops out fast. I know alotta people say that they would fight if the usa was invaded and then when i ask them about the iraqis fighting back they say its different.I know there is a great article written by Tariq Ali on this subject.I dont prfess to be an expert on geopolitics i have no clue ofwhat to do.
here is the article http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1076480,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. Clarify something for me, please:
By the US getting "out" of Iraq, will DK be sending them home or issuing most of them new helmets (with UN on them)?

How many foreign troops are we to expect if the UN takes over?

Seems like most UN missions have been dominated by US troops anyways, but the symbolic significance of being under UN control is very important - even if it is just symbolic.

Right now, the message comes off as a drastic reduction in troops (security) in Iraq. That's what may not be sitting well in many people's minds about Kucinich's plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. the US is NOT a major supplier of UN peacekeeping forces
and the expectations of how many foreign troops is a question the UN will have to answer, but since it hasn't been brought up there is no plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. wrong
UN peacekeeping has not been dominated by US troops. Far from it. Look it up and learn something . . .

http://www.un.org/Depts/dpko/dpko/home.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Wow... Thanks for the info.
Even Bangladesh kicks our butt. The numbers show the potential power of the UN, and what's REALLY standing in the way of their progress: USA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. He's way off base. We blew up the country. We have a
responsibility to repair it. Along with others, of course, which is not happening currently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. read the plan please
http://www.kucinich.us/bringourtroopshome.php

The US owes a moral debt to the people of Iraq for the damage caused by the US invasion. The US will also owe a contribution to the UN to help Iraq make the transition to self-government. American taxpayers deserve that their contributions be handled in an accountable, transparent manner. However, Americans are not required to build a state-of-the-art infrastructure as the Administration is planning. The Administration is ordering for top-shelf technology from US corporations for Iraq and paid for by US taxpayers. Sweetheart deals have been awarded with billions of dollars to top corporations and political contributors. That is precisely what corrupts the Administration’s reconstruction efforts today. Instead, Iraqis should be employed to repair Iraq, and US taxpayers should pay only for the damage caused by the US invasion, including compensation for its victims. US taxpayers should not be asked, however, to furnish for Iraq what we do not have here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. we do have a responsibility to repair it
which is why a US dominated force, and paying heavily for a UN force to go in would be good. But we cannot continue the way we are...it just asks for more and more bodybags
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. And DK wants reparations for the families of the innocents
we killed.No one can replace their lives, but we can admit we were wrong by doing this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
18. DPKO Mission
THE MISSION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PEACEKEEPING OPERATIONS

In accordance with the purposes and principles enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations, the Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO) is dedicated to assisting the Member States and the Secretary-General in their efforts to maintain international peace and security. The Department's mission is to plan, prepare, manage and direct UN peacekeeping operations, so that they can effectively fulfil their mandates under the overall authority of the Security Council and General Assembly, and under the command vested in the Secretary-General.

DPKO provides political and executive direction to UN peacekeeping operations, and maintains contact with the Security Council, troop and financial contributors, and parties to the conflict in the implementation of Security Council mandates. DPKO strives to provide the best possible and most cost-efficient administrative and logistical support to missions in the field through the timely deployment of quality equipment and services, adequate financial resources and well-trained personnel. The Department works to integrate the efforts of UN, governmental and non-governmental entities in the context of peacekeeping operations. DPKO also provides guidance and support on military, police, mine action, and logistical and administrative issues to other UN political and peacebuilding missions.

Each peacekeeping operation has a specific set of mandated tasks, but all share certain common aims - to alleviate human suffering, and create conditions and build institutions for self-sustaining peace. The substantial presence of a peacekeeping operation on the ground contributes to this aim by introducing the UN as a third party with a direct impact on the political process. In exercise of its tasks, DPKO aims to minimize the many risks to which peacekeepers may be exposed in the field.

Peacekeeping operations may consist of several components, including a military component, which may or may not be armed, and various civilian components encompassing a broad range of disciplines. Depending on their mandate, peacekeeping missions may be required to:

Deploy to prevent the outbreak of conflict or the spill-over of conflict across borders;

Stabilize conflict situations after a cease fire, to create an environment for the parties to reach a lasting peace agreement;

Assist in implementing comprehensive peace agreements;

Lead states or territories through a transition to stable government, based on democratic principles, good governance and economic development.

http://www.un.org/Depts/dpko/dpko/info/page3.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dpbrown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Fantastic information!
I'm more well-informed after reading your very well-grounded posts.

:thumbsup:

DPB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Glad you found the DPKO info informative
Imagine what UN peacekeepers could accomplish if the US actually got behind their efforts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dpbrown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #23
38. Isn't that the truth
If the US hadn't kept the UN in check so it was never in a position to interfere with US plans for expansion across the globe, the world would be a better place now.

I'm confident that a President Kucinich would bring full support to UN efforts to develop real international concensus, and a body of well-grounded international law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
20. Annan, Negroponte to Meet, Discuss Iraq
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-3606596,00.html

Friday January 9, 2004 7:46 PM


By NICK WADHAMS

Associated Press Writer

UNITED NATIONS (AP) - The United Nations needs to hear from the U.S.-led coalition and Iraqi leaders before deciding whether to return to Iraq, but Secretary-General Kofi Annan has concrete ideas about what role the world body should play, officials said.

* * * *

``Everyone wants to see a successful transition to sovereignty in Iraq and everyone has their thinking caps on as to the best way to do that,'' U.N. spokesman Fred Eckhard said Friday. ``We are maintaining an open mind while we listen to whatever the Brits and Americans put forward to us and we're also listening to what the Iraqis are saying.''

* * * *

Annan met with Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., a senior member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, on Thursday. Hagel, a leading backer of the United Nations, said they discussed the Jan. 19 meeting, and agreed that getting U.N. workers back into Iraq quickly was crucial.

``I believe that the secretary-general does have some very specific ideas about how the U.N. could participate,'' Hagel said. He repeated his belief that having the United Nations in Iraq in a prominent role would bring international legitimacy to U.S. work there.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revcarol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. VERRRY telling remark there by Hagel.
"He repeated his belief that having the United Nations in Iraq in a prominent role(UNDER U. S. COMMAND AND BREMER AND CONDI'S TEAM TO SELECT AND GIVE PREFERENCE TO THEIR CONTRACTORS) would bring INTERNATIONAL LEGITIMACY to U. S. work there.

Band-aid for hemorrhaging patient, anyone?

Gotta add legitimacy to our immoral, illegitimate, illegal work there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iowapeacechief Donating Member (331 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
22. Go Dennis!
GO DENNIS GO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
24. keep it kicked for Blumrich n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThirdWheelLegend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
25. The kick is up and it's
the best candidate!


TWL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD
for Dennis!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-09-04 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
28. Was anyone else upset about Moseley-Braun's attack on Dennis
in the debate and her support for a long expensive occupation? I'm glad we had Dennis to support getting out of there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThirdWheelLegend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 04:09 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. Dennis does seem..
Seems to be there for US, the people.

kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sean Reynolds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 04:14 AM
Response to Original message
31. No he isn't!
Al Sharpton shares Kucinich's views as well!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Yes
but where is Al's plan? I haven't seen it and I've looked for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sean Reynolds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Well Al is a little slow.
But he's said it in the debates MANY times that he'd bring the troops home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
33. there's also
the small matter that the UN doesn't WANT to do it.

How do we make them do it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. The UN will usually do whatever the US wants
so a few carrots instead of the damn stick, and we'll be in business
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iowapeacechief Donating Member (331 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. How do we get the UN to go along...
...is the wrong question.

The right question is how to get the US to cooperate with the world community and work multilaterally through the UN and otherwise. I understand that Dennis's plan is about cooperation in rebuilding Iraq and supporting the emergence of legitimate governance. It's not about how to replace U.S. troops with others. That could be part of the solution, but it's not the central issue or the real goal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThirdWheelLegend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-04 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Cooperation..
I think that word has too many syllables for the BFEE. Unless you move it around to spell Corporation.


TWL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThirdWheelLegend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-12-04 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
39. Kick to stop the illegal occupation and Bring the Troops Home
TWL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC