Are all these clearly bogus polls an indication....

[LTRS]

that they are setting the stage to steal this election? These wild swings come from media and others reporting one polling outfit one day and a different one the next. I don't mean to sound paranoid, but never before in my life have I seen such wildly fluctuating polling between polling companies.

Are they simply trying to drum up plausibility for ANY outcome?

[punpirate]

1. Those pollsters whose methodology...

... is in question, deserve some skepticism.

Those whose methodology is sound ought to be watched. I know that it's difficult to think that Kerry isn't leading, but, in fact, he might not be in some areas.

The widespread SBL ads have had an effect. The RNC convention had an effect.

Take heart. If the debates are even close to balanced, Kerry will prevail and the polls will change.

Bush is a liar and a scoundrel. At some point, the comparison has to become apparent even to the politically brain-dead.

[Vincardog]

2. They have to make the Diebold fake results seem plausible.

If the polls show the truth: T
that Every Gore voter is for Kerry
and 20% of the folks Bush fooled last time have seen the light
and are for Kerry
and that there are 15% who did not vote last time but they are going for Kerry. Then it would be very hard to say Bush 'won' according to the Diebold crooked machines.

In other words "Dude where is my landslide?"

There is no way The Idiot Bush can have any kind of vote after all his Buck ups.