Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Someone needs to define Kerry's position on Iraq...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-04 09:39 AM
Original message
Someone needs to define Kerry's position on Iraq...
Edited on Fri Sep-24-04 09:45 AM by Dawgs
Because if we can't agree amongst ourselves then how are the undecideds and swing voters going to agree.

Here are my thoughts. I am sure someone can come up with something better.

On "World is safer without Saddam"
Kerry initially said that the world was safer without Saddam. He still agrees with this statement, just not at the cost of Bush's war(200 billion, 1000's of lives, no WMDS, no Al-Qaeda connection). He stated this in his speech at NYU earlier this week.

On Kerry's flip-flopping positions. Said "he would voted for it, before voting against it"
Kerry NEVER voted for the war. Kerry initially trusted Bush and voted for the effort to disarm Saddam peacefully. He voted to only use power as a last resort. Bush ignored Kerry and others and took us to war as a first resort. Bush then screwed it up so bad that now many believe Kerry has changed his position.

Please let me know what you think.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AIJ Alom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-04 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. Would it have hurted to have waited ?
19 Months after the start of the Iraq War, we are still there.

Would it have hurt to have waited to fully arm all our troops with the body armor and armored humvees they needed ? Would it have hurt to have waited to let the United Nations Arms inspectors finish their work ? Would it have hurt to have waited to bring more allies to our side ? Would it have hurt to have waited to plan for the occupation of Iraq ?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-04 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Are we better off without Saddam WITH THIS WAR?
It's like we tried to remove a corn with an unplanned random stabbing of our own foot.

Israel is better off without Saddam, IF IT WAS NOT FOR THIS WAR. Will the next Iraq regime love Israel, or be even less against it than Saddam? Maybe. More likely, fanaticism will rule Iraq if we cannot conquer Iraq by election time.

Fine, Saddam is in jail. But the cost has been worse than if Saddam had lived in power until he was over 200 years old.

What if you hired a company to remove a bee hive from inside your house and did $50,000 in damages killing two of your family members. Are you better off without the bees?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Counsel Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-04 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. Um... KERRY Is "Defining Kerry's Position on Iraq..."
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bookman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-04 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. Kerry on Iraq
Here you’ll find the truth about John Kerry's consistent position on the Iraq war. John Kerry hasn't been flip-flopping.



George Bush just hasn't been listening.







http://www.kerryoniraqwar.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-04 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. see here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-04 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. You guys really need to read posts before repsonding...
My point is that everyday I see DU'rs saying that Kerry supported the war and the ousting of Saddam. I don't believe that to be true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonicx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-04 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. he supports the war because we have to finish it
Edited on Fri Sep-24-04 11:31 AM by sonicx
but he doesn't support the way it happened(skipping UN and weapons inspections)

and he's said about saddam that we're better off without him, but the mess in iraq is what we get in exchange. and that weaponless saddam could have been handled in other ways besides putting thousands of troops' lives on the line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-04 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
8. Good replies.
:hi:

On question #1. I always toss in "we'd be safer with Osama Bin Laden in custody."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-04 11:37 AM
Original message
Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-04 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
9. On the $87 billion...
Senator Kerry: "The $87 billion for the troops was never in question. Of course we were going to give them what they need.

"The question was how to pay for it. I wanted to pay for it by making a loan to Iraq and by repealing Mr. Bush*'s tax cut for the ultra wealthy. That’s the bill I voted FOR. Mr. Bush* wanted to pay for that $87 billion with the hard-earned tax dollars of average Americans. That’s the bill I voted AGAINST.

"But the real question is why did George W. Bush* send our brave troops into a war without body armor in the first place??! And why hasn’t he given it to them yet?!?"

23.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-04 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Why doesn't the media report it?
Annoys the piss out of me. And people on this board know full well what he's said and for whatever twisted reason, prefer to ignore it to further their own political agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-04 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
10. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-04 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
11. He needs to take a firm stand against the war and the occupation.
His vote for the IWR is still biting him in the ass. He needs to renounce it and take it off the table. The "I would still vote for it" rhetoric is killing him.

He needs to come up with a realistic plan to get out of Iraq instead of making idiotic statements about "winning" an unwinnable war.

The war in Iraq is the issue where Bush is most vulnerable and Kerry is getting trumped at every turn because he's still trying to defend his vote and appear "strong on defense".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-04 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Only to total idiots
I can't believe how many there are. I can't believe how many who are supposed to be fighting Bush and hate the media lies, turn around and repeat media lies. He didn't say he'd vote for the war, he said he'd vote to give Bush the authority to deal with Saddam because Saddam needed to be dealt with. That doesn't mean a unilateral rush to war, which he has said so many times I imagine he's getting sick of saying it. We can't get out of Iraq and let the country become a terrorist haven, it is just not an option. The only hope is changing the atmosphere by engaging the region and the world in the outcome in Iraq. Kerry would do that, Bush won't because he wants to turn it into a US base in the middle east.

You can think whatever you want about the war. But don't put words in Kerry's mouth to futher your own agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-04 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
12. JK: Undecideds Operate at a 5th grade level, esp. those in the Media
So make it simpler, and repeat over and over the same thing.

Put up charts and posters.

Repeat the difference between your:

1. Support for Authorization of Force to get U.N.
WMD inspections

AND

2. Opposition to the preemptive and premature INVASION before
inspections were completed and without U.N. approval.

Repeat that Osama bin Laden and 9-11 had nothing to do with Sadaam Hussein and Iraq.

Repeat that there were ways of getting rid of Sadaam other
that sacrificing 1000 U.S. lives and ten's of thousands of
Iraqi lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knowbody0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-04 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. kerry's position on iraq
the major problem with a position on iraq is that the position IN iraq is whatever occurs between now and then. bush exploits the lives of the puppies on the ground which stirs the heart. kerry must think first of his brothers in arms. it is most difficult and catch 22. however, it is not difficult to point out the misinformation of this administration and its lack of support for kids on the ground
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-24-04 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. Kerry and Iraq
Are you living in Neverland? I have no problem with Kerry's position with Iraq? You either can't hear, read or see! His position is clear to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC