Today I tuned into Hannity, and he was trumpeting that Terry McAuliffe used "the exact same words" to accuse * as were used in the infamous CBS memo, BEFORE THE MEMO WAS RELEASED. McAuliffe's statement accused Bush of looking for someone to "sugarcoat" his record (the term used in the memo), when McAuliffe could have used any other words to convey the same idea. The fact that he used the word "sugarcoat" before the CBS story aired is thus EVIDENCE of CBS/DNC/Kerry collaboration!
Then I googled and found this site:
http://terrymcauliffe.newstrove.com/The site gives brief excerpts from recent news articles mentioning "mcauliffe" and "sugarcoat." The following entry was about halfway down the page
09/23 03:16 PM
Published in National Review Online - Indexed on Sep 23, 2004 Relevance:
WHY WAS TERRY USING TERMS FROM THE CBS MEMO 9 HOURS BEFORE BROADCAST? -UPDATE: IT WASN'T BEFORE. UPDATE: Turns out McAuliffe's statement referring to "sugarcoated" went out as the CBS report was starting, and it was based on a story on the CBS News web site which was posted before the "60 Minutes II" report was broadcast. The RNC timeline is erroneous. My apologies to readers who read this and concluded there was a smoking gun connection between the DNC and CBS. I should have checked what the RNC stated in its timeline. *sigh* Damn, I'm not as dissimilar to Dan Rather as I thought.
*
*
*
Gee, do you think Hannity will offer a retraction tomorrow???????? (I looked quickly on the NRO site for the actual retraction but didn't see it. Either I missed it, or they took it off REEEALLY fast.)