Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

List of Pundits who Declared the P.O. Dead (more added)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 09:35 PM
Original message
List of Pundits who Declared the P.O. Dead (more added)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fantastic!
And most of the ones who aren't declaring it dead outright are now describing it as "back from the dead."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thank you, PS..and we had to go
through everyone of these. I sent Jane an email back in August and told her I didn't appreciate her disingenuouness on President Obama not including a PO in the Bill..only she said.."It's become clear President Obama is not including a Public Option. Me.."No, Jane, it hasn't become clear".

Jane Hamsher:

Of course he’s not going to include a public option — as DC’s beltway class well knows, it’s been gone for a long time.



Rep. Dennis Kucinich:

"It’s my opinion that the blue dogs are doing exactly what the white house wants them to do. The public option was a trial balloon. I can not stress how cynical and brutal the politics are. This is not about the public option. Anyone looking for the public option needs to look someplace else. It is not going to happen and anybody who says it is is in fantasy land."


What do they know?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. You know what? IT HASN'T PASSED YET.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Not the point. It's in the bill. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Still, the ones that declared it DEAD look like asses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. It will. Obama will sign a bill with the Public Option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. Let's not forget about Mr. Super Progressive himself Dennis Kucinich
Edited on Mon Oct-26-09 10:30 PM by SpartanDem
While people like Bernie Sanders, Jay Rockefeller and countless members in the House were out fighting for a public option this litte ray of sunshine was drumming up campaign donations predicting doom and gloom for the public option.

No Chuck Todd on that list? That tool was one of the worst of the MSM bunch.

Dear Kos Community,

It is said one should not ask how sausage or laws are made. Are you concerned about a public option? Let me share with you some insight about health care legislation which may not be good for your health.

A lesson in politics. The Kucinich Prediction: Here's what's going to happen ...

DennisKucinich's diary :: :: 1. House will make a big deal about keeping/putting a public option in HR3200 because it competes with insurance companies and will keep insurance rates low.

2. The White House will refer to the President's speech last week where he spoke favorably of the public option.

3. The Senate will kill the competitive public option in favor of non-competitive "co-ops". Senate leaders like Kent Conrad have said the votes to pass a public option were never there in the Senate.

4. The bill will come to a House-Senate Conference Committee without the public option.

5. House Democrats will be told to support the conference report on the legislation to support the President.

6. The bill will pass, not with a "public option" but with a private mandate requiring 30 million uninsured to buy private health insurance (if one doesn't already have it). If you are broke, you may get a subsidy. If you are not broke, you will get a fine if you do not purchase insurance.

This legislative sausage will be celebrated as a new breakthrough and will be packaged as health insurance reform. However, the bill may require a Surgeon General's warning label: Your Money or Your Life!

The bill that Congress passes may pale in comparison to the bill that millions of Americans will get every month/year for having or not having private health insurance.

It will take four years for the new legislation to go into effect. During that time, we are going to build a constituency of millions in support of real health care, a constituency which will be recognized and a cause which is right and just: Health Care as a Civil Right.

Join our efforts. Sign the petition. Contribute. Insure a democratic future.

Thank you.

Dennis



http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/9/15/782607/-The-Private-Mandate-Sausage-Machine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. It was pining for the fjords after all. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. wow. not even going to open the link in the OP, but what a new low.

- based on some posters' derogatory references to Jane Hamsher (of FDL) and Dennis Kucinich (of the US Congress).

:wtf:


last time i heard this was NOT the "DLC Underground", but.... maybe i missed something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. You're shocked are you? Hamsher is a first rate distorter and don't forget
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. that was a pure, classical projection re. Jane being "a first rate distorter" on your part.
the difference is that her reputation is impeccable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Impeccable?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Riiiight.. This is the first part of her email to me in August..
"Dear cha

Over the weekend it became clear that the Obama Administration wants to drop the public option from health care reform...blah blah blah"



My answer..

No, Jane, it didn't become clear to me at all that President Obama wants to drop Public Option.

I take the President at his word. I do believe in rewarding good behavior..I also believe in not supporting bad behavior.

There are many people out here who support the President by not passing disingenuous bad information.


Cha *****
New York
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #11
23. Not with me it's not.
And nothing to do with health reform, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I know she's a first rate distorter and no
shame evidently.

I guess it's all about getting money from the perpetually disgruntled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. I'm sorry are they somehow above reproach
more than any other who's said similar things?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. Lawrence O'Donnell's had a terminal case of sour grapes since this all began
Didn't 'er done when he had the shot....

Nate was closer to the Schrödinger's cat approach- which is still my position!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. It is dead.
They've just given the name "Public Option" to something that is not even close to a strong public option.

But any reason to party, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Tell that to
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Citing the WPost are we?
Break out the champaign. Yea. We won. Yea. Insurance companies roll in tax wealth. Yea. No price controls. Yea.

Go ahead and celebrate. We know what's really happening. But you go ahead and celebrate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. What?
:rofl:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madamesilverspurs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
20. Well, after reading that list and those comments
the guy with the ripped abs in the ad at the bottom was a welcome surprise!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWebHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
22. It is dead...
Reid doesn't have 60 votes. This was done purely to tell the base: "We tried." The idea of State A opting out of a public option only to then subsidize an entitlement program for State B and C who opt in is fundamentally undemocratic. Not sure it has been done in the country's history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Kindly study up on Senate rules and procedures.
He only needs 60 votes to stop a filibuster, not to pass the bill.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-27-09 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Nobody should be surprised if the PO falls by the wayside
Edited on Tue Oct-27-09 01:55 AM by depakid
before the chamber approves a final bill, nor surprised if it then comes back from the dead in conference committee merger with the House's reform bill.

Then the public option would need only a simple majority in the Senate, a probable sure thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC