Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Philadelphia Bulletin - Bipartisan Opposition To Healthcare Reform. The Angry Right

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-25-09 05:29 PM
Original message
Philadelphia Bulletin - Bipartisan Opposition To Healthcare Reform. The Angry Right
Edited on Sun Oct-25-09 05:32 PM by TomCADem
This is interesting. I was reading some of the DU attacks on President Obama's efforts to reform health care, and I was marveling at how similar they sound to far right attacks on President Obama. Just a coincidence or is opposition to health care reform becoming bipartisan?

My point is that if the left is saying that Obama is corrupt and the right that Obama is corrupt, then where exactly are we?

http://thebulletin.us/articles/2009/10/25/commentary/op-eds/doc4ae4b917c18ed241678853.txt

###

Obama Taking Us On Path To Fascism

• When a health insurance company that marketed Medicare policies tried to warn its policyholders that Obamacare would hurt seniors’ insurance programs, the Department of Health and Human Services issued on a gag order on such communications with policyholders. It also said that the warning was misleading, which it was not. The gag order was since revoked, but its initial promulgation tells you something about the mentality of the White House and its attitude toward criticism. The Washington Post reported on the “gag order” as follows: “The federal government has ordered health insurers to stop telling Medicare beneficiaries that proposed health reform legislation could hurt seniors and jeopardize their benefits. The government might take enforcement action against insurers that have tried to mobilize opposition to the legislation by sending their enrollees "misleading and confusing" messages, a senior official of the Department of Health and Human Services said in a memo…” Query: Who will take action against Mr. Obama for the countless lies he’s telling in an effort to sell Obamacare?

• When segments of the health insurance industry turned against Obamacare, Mr. Obama threatened to have the antitrust exemption of the industry revoked. When the timing of the threat is taken into account, it is clear that this was revenge and payback for Obamacare criticism. For details see New York Times (October 17, 2008). Working in tandem with Mr. Obama, Congressional leaders also issued threats to insurance companies that dared to dissent.

• Any criticism of Mr. Obama and Obamacare is met with harsh criticism and what Mr. Obama once described as “calling them out.” For example, a recent radio address from Mr. Obama accused the insurance industry of misleading and improper criticism of Obamacare. The address lasted a little over six minutes, but did not sight a single fact or bit of evidence indicating that the industry was using deceptive tactics. As usual, the Obama speech was long on name-calling but devoid of facts and information. Unless you accept the Obama program, you are almost immediately and automatically branded as dealing in illegitimate criticism and “politics as usual.”

• Mr. Obama and his administration are willing to tell lies, and big lies, over and over again, perhaps on the Goebbels theory that if you tell a big enough lie often enough it will be believed. One of the Obama lies that I found particularly irksome was his claim after the Senate Committee passed a version of Obamacare that it was a bipartisan product. In fact, Obamacare had finally garnered one Republican supporter (Senator Olympia “Republican in Name Only” Snowe, R., Me.) out of a Congress with 535 members. What’s worse, in the legislative process, the Republicans were frozen out and “did not have a seat at the table” to use one of Obama’s favorite figures of speech.

###
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-25-09 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. How can they say
Obama is corrupt. What in the heck has he done to be corrupt. I find fault that he is not pushing the public option, but there is nothing to say that is corruption. But then the republicans always call him names no matter what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-25-09 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ask the wise DU'ers who inform us that he is owned by Wall Street. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. AKA, the inanely
uniformed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gently Used Deal Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. Depends on what the meaning of corruption is
Since he opened himself to big pharma to cut the original pre-compromised deal, I think it's fair to ask if that, by definition, a corrupting influence.

Maybe he's a small minded 21st Century Dem - when we need a large minded 20th century model, with all the options. Big thinking, broad acting, and brave, not only when it comes to bailing out banks and sticking in Afghanistan.

We can only hope. Good thing FDR didn't offer up a "social security option" as a part of his "mostly new deal"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Social security was shit when first enacted. Learn history, then come back and post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noel711 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-26-09 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is pathetic... the old Philly Bulletin stopped being a print rag
and went defunct years ago.

This 'online' bulletin isn't much better that a right-wing
fear machine.

And Herb Denenberg used to be a local personality on local
news television, but somehow he went off the rails.

someone needs to check his meds...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC