Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Valerie Jarrett smacks down Politico

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 09:46 AM
Original message
Valerie Jarrett smacks down Politico
Edited on Fri Oct-23-09 09:47 AM by ProSense

Public Option Pressure: As Stories Leak WH And Dem Leaders Say No Decision Has Been Made

Christina Bellantoni

House leadership sources are telling TPMDC they think news on the "robust" public option is leaking out to pressure House Speaker Nancy Pelosi as the health care discussions are getting hotter, and closer to the final deal.

Politico's story this morning suggests Pelosi doesn't have the votes, but our sources insist the leadership isn't yet at that stage.

Presidential adviser Valerie Jarrett jabbed at the Politico story while appearing on MSNBC's Morning Joe today, saying of the reporter who penned the piece, "I don't know whether Mike Allen can actually count votes or not."

<...>

Jarrett, one of Obama's closest advisers, said it was "too soon to tell" if the White House would get the public option it prefers.

"We're going to keep pushing until the very last moment," Jarrett said.

Late update: Here's video of Jarrett.

link


Edited to add: Politico Lies to Pressure Pelosi to drop Robust Public Option




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yup, The REAL Story W/ Better Analysis And PHONE NUMBERS At KOS:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeycola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Kos is saying they are 12-15 votes short of robust PO also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. WITH 12 Congresspeople Already LEANING YES
Jesus, read the fucking story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeycola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. I did. No need to be so grumpy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Then Why Are You Still Whining?
Edited on Fri Oct-23-09 10:15 AM by Beetwasher
If you read it then you'd know how full of shit your "concern" is. This is not bad news, it's good news. We're pretty much there despite the idiotic Politico spin. Do the math. 12-15 votes short w/ 12 leaning yes. And a shitload of "undecideds".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeycola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Because 'leaning' is not the same as the stories yesterday which
said the votes were in. And leaning is to too iffy this late in the game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Actually, Leaning Is Not "Iffy" At All At This Point In The Game
Despite that YOU (and your buddies at Politico) would like to spin it that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeycola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. You making
ASSumptions that my buddies are at Politico is rude and stupid and I am not going to waste my time with you. bye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. LOL! Buh Bye!
Run away! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #6
14. we understand. you have your POV and you are pushing it...
despite the mounting evidence you are incorrect.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeycola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. You did not understand as you claim. Have a good day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Oh, I got it.
Edited on Fri Oct-23-09 12:37 PM by Aramchek
and with every post you further clarify that understanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Congressman Grijalva said eight for the robust public option
here

You seem to forget that there are two other versions, including the one in the existing bill, which already has the votes to pass.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeycola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. I am cheering for the most robust, the one Pelsoi said was the strongest. and no, I
did not forget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. I know that Allen was brought up a GOP'er
And, he was a right winger in college.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeycola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
9. It would be best if Obama or Valorie just said WHICh PO he wants instead of the
vague=he wants a po.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanpalmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-24-09 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #9
20. Apparently the WH prefers one kind of po
Jarrett said it was "too soon to tell" if the White House would get the public option it prefers.

Which one does it prefer?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
12. Politico is a right wing website....I never visit, or pay much attention
to anything they have to say. Thanks for this ProSense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeOverFear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
18. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-23-09 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
19. Thanks for this. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC