Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Very classy: Kerry smacks down "de facto Sec. of State" question as "inappropriate" in presser

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 04:24 PM
Original message
Very classy: Kerry smacks down "de facto Sec. of State" question as "inappropriate" in presser
This is an example of the press making up a conflict that does not exist. Anyone who has read detail accounts of John Kerry's negotiations with Karzai in Afghanistan knows it was a team effort, where he was constantly on the phone with Secretary of State Clinton and Special Envoy Dick Holbrooke, not to mention the U.S. Ambassador Eikenberry. But that did not stop the press from playing games. Kerry would have none of it:

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/10/kerry-common-sense-that-obama-should-wait-on-new-afghan-strategy-until-runoff-compelte.html#

Kerry was asked about some calling his actions this week as those of a so-called de factor Secretary of State.

He called this characterization unfair, that he had Secretary of State’s Clinton’s support, and he was not freelancing in any way.

“That’s an unfair characterization. I don’t think that’s appropriate,” Kerry said, “I was in touch with Secretary Clinton constantly. I appreciate the way in which she embraced my role. We talked frequently. I thought it was important that I not take steps in some freelancing way that wasn’t appropriate to the administration’s policy. And she encouraged me to stay at it and be engaged in it and I think we work as an effective team.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Republicon corporate media serves the Republicon corporate borg
not America, and not the citizens of America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Classy, as always.
:headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theoldman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. Obama is smart in sending the right man or woman to do the job.
Different people have different talents. I do not remember Secretary Rice ever accomplishing a mission successfully. Bush put too much faith in her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. While ultimately, of course, Obama's decision, who's to say that
Secretary Clinton wasn't part of the decision-making progress.

The GOP and the media don't like teamwork.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. There is no doubt she was part of the decision making.
Harry Reid talked to her on the phone and she specifically said Kerry was doing good work in Afghanistan. Basically, Harry needed Kerry back in the Senate, so Hillary was telling him WHY JK could not be there.

It was on the Senate floor:

http://www.c-spanvideo.org/congress/?q=node/77539&hors=s#

Click on Reid, about a minute and a half in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Nice. Love factual info like this! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. Teamwork is for godless commies.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Engineer4Obama Donating Member (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Equal branches of government
Kerry Represents the United States Legislative branch.

Personally I think Obama is lucky he has three very capable diplomats in Clinton, Biden, and Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Obama is smart and lucky and so
are we!

Kerry is nothing but Class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
26. The man in your avatar would be very proud
Edited on Wed Oct-21-09 10:55 PM by politicasista
of his friend, student and successor as the now Senior Senator of MA.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm surprised that no one here bought into it. Alot of the shit in the primaries
was media provoked conflict to push Hillary into the evil bitch role and DU fell for that shit HOOK LINE AND SINKER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. What a load of crap.
Edited on Wed Oct-21-09 05:09 PM by DrToast
Yeah, clearly it was the media to blame for all the shit she did.

You know, like agreeing that Florida and Michigan didn't count and then, oops, all of the sudden they did.

Yeah, that was all media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Little bit different relationship between the President and Sec. of State now isnt there? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Certain members of DU were predisposed to fall for anything anti- Hillary.
I'm so glad everything is all "lovey-dovey" nowadays :woohoo::grouphug::woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-22-09 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
31. That shows how manufactored the media concern was - anything real
would have had a huge number of threads, with warring posts.

Instead, the story was that there will be a runoff in Afghanistan, giving hope that the government has a prayer of being seen as legitimate. The fact that Kharzi publicly conceded there was fraud and that this runoff is in accordance with their law is a very good sign. ( Note that even Al Jazeera has his spokesman saying this is their process - http://www.youtube.com/v/RR9z_8VA1R0&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&feature=player_embedded&fs=1 I obviously can not see this as someone in the Middle East would, but the good thing is that this is not being shown as American interference. )

The other story was that John Kerry, did an incredible job here getting Kharzi to take this step. From this and other accounts, Kerry was told of the problem by Ambassador Eikenberry. From this, it is clear that he briefed Clinton on the first meeting he had with Kharzi after that and she was happy to approve him continuing conversations with him. She was in no way undercut here. Kerry was working for what everyone including President Obama and Hillary Clinton wanted and doing with their approval and appreciation.

For the media to try to make this a celebrity story (Kerry vs Clinton) is ridiculous - when they were working towards the same thing. I would hope that Clinton is happy that Kerry is getting the praise he deserves here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. Wasn't that a stinky pile of poopie? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
12. Excellent. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
15. Sadly, this question is a good example of the level of the media, all gotcha and no substance.\nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Yup. The articles Prosense linked to in her thread were awful.
Lots of quotes from David Gergen (sigh).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-22-09 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #16
33. I think the AP article she linked to is very good - I wonder if they changed it
Edited on Thu Oct-22-09 08:26 AM by karynnj
from when it was first posted. Kerry really is doing things beyond what most SFRC chairs can do. When he took over the position, there were articles that with a President of the same party, it was less important than when the Chair was of the opposite party and thus the foreign policy voice of the opposition. What this article admits is that that view was very myopic.

It recognizes some, though not all, of the diplomatic assists that Kerry has been able to give to the Obama team, while doing his job. It doesn't speak of the many incredible hearings Kerry has held, especially on Afghanistan. Just from the words used by various administration people, it is clear that they have been one source of input to the administration. (A serious press would have used them more to understand the complexities of the strategy decisions.)

The only fault is the title "de facto diplomat" and the later refuting of "de facto Secretary of State". It is easy (and I bet intentional that the use of the same Latin (thus "special") adjective is designed to conflate the two. The fact is that Kerry was in fact a a diplomat here - but he was not playing the role of Secretary of State - any more than Holbrooke has there or Mitchell will in the Middle East. That was the media deciding that making it a Kerry vs Clinton story was more fun than covering what it meant to Afghaistan, for which this is just a necessary wee baby step to getting a trusted government. Now, they just have to prepare elections in a very short time frame, run them in a way that no one cries fraud, get a winner and THEN either build a government if Abdullah wins or do major (probably public) house cleaning to prove that he is addressing corruption, if Kharzi wins. That does not negate or minimize Kerry's triumph, but it was avoiding disaster rather than creating peace there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
17. You have to figure that Gibbs having referred to "Secretary Kerry"....
Edited on Wed Oct-21-09 07:16 PM by burning rain
has something to do with this little controversy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Well, to be fair, Gibbs mostly refers to "Secretaries" in these kinds of things,
AND Senator and Secretary both begin with "S".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Hmmm, then, it wouldn't hurt 'em to dig up....
some other instances in which Gibbs has referred to senators as secretaries (not that this is the end of the world in any case). Otherwise there will be suspicion that this reflects the thinking / preference / wish of some within the administration, rather than a simple slip of the tongue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Gibbs' slip doesn't account for the media's feigned cluelessness about
Edited on Wed Oct-21-09 08:14 PM by ProSense
Kerry's role.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Actually, from a more extended AP article on Huff Po, Kerry has a good answer:
Earlier Wednesday, Gibbs slipped during an off-camera briefing and called Kerry, "Secretary Kerry." Gergen did the same thing during a telephone interview.

"I'm famous for making one or two slips in my public life," Kerry said with a weary smile. "So I wouldn't take that too seriously."




Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/21/kerry-becomes-global-advi_n_329426.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Cool~
B-) Always like a little self-deprecating humor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. You know, I wish the media and other pols had taken that view of Kerry's minor gaffes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-22-09 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #22
29. Lovely answer n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
23. Video at Politico:
http://www.politico.com/politico44/perm/1009/reporting_for_duty_f01fff11-51fe-4380-a17e-531a3fc22aab.html#

A reporter asked basically, "How does it feel being de facto Sec. of State", and Kerry interrupted and said that wasn't fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PopSixSquish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
25. The Media Are a Bunch of Clueless Fecking Idiots
As I said on another thread, I would think that the head of the SFRC, the Secretary of State and the President talk to each other on a regular basis. Well at least they do in a normal administration...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-21-09 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
28. Did abc or anyone point out that Cantor and Palin went to Israel
Edited on Thu Oct-22-09 12:07 AM by babylonsister
and Hong Kong (?) respectively and flat out dissed our current president for his policies? Overseas actually criticizing the president?

Kerry consults the SoS constantly, is actually helping to make democracy happen, and "the media" criticizes this?

Sigh.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beachmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-22-09 07:20 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. But they went out of their way in '07 to knock Pelosi & other Democrats
like Kerry who went to Syria.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-22-09 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. True, even though Dodd and Kerry, who went together, were on
Edited on Thu Oct-22-09 08:30 AM by karynnj
the relevant oversight committee - Kerry was even chair of the relevant sub-committee - and they asked for and received a list of questions from Dr Rice that she wanted answers for. (Important as, at that time, she wasn't speaking with Syria.)

Palin has no such role.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-22-09 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #28
32. Right
and lest we forget, DeMint went to Honduras as a show of support for their illegitimate regime. So far, I haven't heard much criticism of any of them in regards to their foreign policy "initiatives". Oh, and what about that one Congressmen questioning the Obama administration to the Chinese? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-22-09 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
35. Very Classy Response - Avoid Media Effort To Generate Drama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC