Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NY Times - Paul Krugman - "Misguided Monetary Mentalities" - Addresses Dollar Devaluation Fears

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 08:05 PM
Original message
NY Times - Paul Krugman - "Misguided Monetary Mentalities" - Addresses Dollar Devaluation Fears
Here is Paul Krugman in his element discussing economic policy and the history of the Great Depression.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/12/opinion/12krugman.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1255395713-uq5efw8Dw7cdELxYAYrV7g

###

In the early 1930s this mentality led governments to raise interest rates and slash spending, despite mass unemployment, in an attempt to defend their gold reserves. And even when countries went off gold, the prevailing mentality made them reluctant to cut rates and create jobs.

But we’re past all that now. Or are we?

***

Consider first the current uproar over the declining international value of the dollar.

The truth is that the falling dollar is good news. For one thing, it’s mainly the result of rising confidence: the dollar rose at the height of the financial crisis as panicked investors sought safe haven in America, and it’s falling again now that the fear is subsiding. And a lower dollar is good for U.S. exporters, helping us make the transition away from huge trade deficits to a more sustainable international position.


But if you get your opinions from, say, The Wall Street Journal’s editorial page, you’re told that the falling dollar is a terrible thing, a sign that the world is losing faith in America (and especially, of course, in President Obama). Something, you believe, must be done to stop the dollar’s slide. And in practice the dollar’s decline has become a stick with which conservative members of Congress beat the Federal Reserve, pressuring the Fed to scale back its efforts to support the economy.

###
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. If we had something to export. The other side is foreigners might buy real estate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yea really, what's $1.3 trillion in 2008?
We just don't have anything to export.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think he's wrong.
Edited on Mon Oct-12-09 10:25 PM by girl gone mad
While a weaker dollar could largely be the result of rising confidence, and it could potentially boost exports, a dollar that is weakening against every asset class, including oil and gold, is not healthy and appears to reflect the Fed's interference in continuing to promote bubble economics more than anything else.

Americans will only benefit from a declining dollar if our wages increase enough to cover the concurrent rise in costs of rent, food and gas. There is no sign of this happening.

Traditionally, capital has fled countries with weakening currencies, negating any positive effect that lower production costs had on trade flows. As investors move into strengthening currencies, the countries that print those currencies use this new found capital to shore up manufacturing, invest in infrastructure and fund other productivity-increasing endeavors, giving the strong currency country a clear competitive advantage.

The Wall Street Journal has little room to talk, having spent the last decade supporting the economic agenda of weak-dollar Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. I agree that he's off here
But I blame it on the fact that he's working for the system that wants to keep the truth about the dollar from getting out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-12-09 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. when people say Krugman i think of kermit the frog.
i have no idea why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. I agree with Krugman
A return to moderate inflation rates would not be a bad thing. As a worker, I have always gotten my best wage increases during periods of inflation. Since my biggest financial responsibility is a fixed principle and interest rate mortgage, it is not subject to inflation and the raises in wage simply make it easier to pay off.

Within reasonable limits, a declining dollar is not a bad thing at all. The cure however, higher interest rates to tighten money supply, has substantial risk of curtailing economic growth and delaying recovery. Politically, it is critical that we turn the economy around, this is key to retaining control, and retaining control for a decade or so is critical to make the changes we need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. Lower Dollar = Inflation
Edited on Tue Oct-13-09 07:18 AM by denem
Inflation is good. St Krugman says so.

Slash your debt. Pay it back with deflated money. Fed. Treasury NB. Fuck the Chinese; Screw the Saudis. It's only paper bois amd grrls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-13-09 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
8. John Maynard Keynes "The Economic Consequences of the Peace" (1919)
Edited on Tue Oct-13-09 07:24 AM by denem
Britain maintained an over priced currency during and 1920's and royally screwed their economy. Their rationale - to protect the Sovereignty of Sterling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC