Orly Has a New Argument - Democratic Underground

Stephanie

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sun Oct-11-09 11:33 PM
Original message

Orly Has a New Argument

Edited on Mon Oct-12-09 12:27 AM by Stephanie

Now she wants her case heard because a "former Scotland Yard Inspector" reported that Obama has used "mulitiple social security numbers."

http://www.scribd.com/doc/20921150/Request-for-Judicial-Notice-11-Oct-2009

Plaintiffs have, in the course of their investigations during the past year, accumulated a substantial amount of evidence concerning the Mr. Obama’s fraudulent manipulation of his own identity, and the legal identity of others. To this end Plaintiffs have previously submitted the Affidavit and Independent Investigative Report of Former Scotland Yard Inspector Neal Sankey and now submit the expanded Report of Ohio Private Investigator Susan Daniels.

These two private investigation reports, although slightly duplicative, show beyond reasonable doubt a pattern of manipulation of Barack Hussein Obama’s identity, employment, and residence information. The use of a multitude of social security numbers alone is indicative that Mr. Obama appears to have committed a substantial number of felony violations, including but not limited to violations of 42 U.S.C. §408(a)(7)(B). which shows dishonest political advantage during 2008 election. Plaintiffs submit again that “the American People Reserve the Right to know”. Furthermore, the examination and decipherment of the trail of deception so casually left by this successful candidate will (1) lead ultimately to discovery of the truth about his origins and citizenship, (2) reveal the nature of the scheme to defraud by which this Mr. Barack Hussein Obama became President, and (3) show the degree and nature of the collusion of other people and parties in the scheme of defraud leading to his election, including but not limited to the other Defendants.

Sankey's exhibit is not available online yet. I'd sure like to see this one. WTF is she talking about now?

http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/

ORLY’S RECORD OF FAILURE

Posted by Exploring the Natural Born Citizen Clause on October 11, 2009

From Politijab.com we learn about: ORLY’S RECORD OF FAILURE

Are we missing any details? How about corrections, amendments, failures to sign… I bet a significant part of Keyes/Barnett v Obama filings are not directly related to motions on the case.

Keyes v. Bowen (California state court): Kreep unseats Orly, dismissed and costs awarded, more details needed …
Lightfoot v. Bowen (California Supreme Court): Dismissed. Application for “stay pending a writ of cert” at U.S. Supreme Court denied.
Barnett v. Obama (C.D. Cal.): Defense motion to dismiss pending. (this was the second case, IIRC, filed 1/20/09)
Took Orly 9 months to properly serve Obama
Orly filed lawsuit after Obama was sworn in
Filed unredacted personal information
Attempt to remove Magistrate Judge for following the rules of the Court dismissed
6 notices of errors or deficiencies
Brockhausen v. Andrade (Texas state court): Defense motion to dismiss granted.
Quo Warranto Easterling, et al. v. Obama, et al. (US District Attorney and Supreme Court versions)
Cook v. Good (M.D. Ga.): Defense motion to dismiss granted.
Cook v. Simtech (M.D. Fla.): Case dismissed sua sponte with comments that suit was “wholly frivolous.”
Case dismissed within 1 day
Rhodes v. Gates (W.D. Tex.): Relief denied 30 minutes after being requested for failure to meet filing requirements. Case dismissed.
Rhodes v. MacDonald (M.D. Ga.): Defense motion to dismiss granted. Sanctions pending.
2 Notices of Error

And our totals:

10 lawsuits filed or attempted to file
9 dismissed by the court (or refused by clerks) so far
2 of which were deemed frivolous in the opinion of the court
2 others that the clerks office refused to file.

O RLY? What next?

She's still fishing for discovery. Birthers are convinced that if they can just get discovery they'll find something, anything to hang their hats on. They don't believe in the birth certificate bs OR the new SSN story. They're dreaming of the day the President will sit down in Orly's dentist chair to be deposed. And Michelle, Hillary, Biden, Robert Gates, also.

Wait, is this the exhibit? Did she seriously submit this? It shows someone named Barack Obama residing at 123 White House, Irvine CA. OMG! That's it! We're screwn!

http://www.scribd.com/doc/19216219/RhodesTX-01-Exhibits-attached-to-TRO-Motion

Oops! Just checked her site (don't advise you go there) - she's linking a new profile in "Rolling Stones" magazine. Hah! They call her the "Typhoid Mary of the Birther Movement"!

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/30205785/what_birthers_want/print

Yet even if the original hospital birth record were to be handed to her by God himself, that would not persuade Taitz and her followers of Obama's legitimacy. Indeed, Taitz claims that the founder's definition of "natural-born citizen" meant a child born to two parents who were both citizens. "Based on that fact alone," Taitz says, "Obama cannot be U.S. president because he had split allegiance from the time of his birth until now."

What exactly are these "split allegiances"? Taitz believes that Obama, while never naturalized as an American, is a citizen of Kenya, as well as its former colonial occupier the United Kingdom, and of Indonesia. The crazy keeps cascading from there. The president, she claims, has "39 different Social Security numbers." She adds, "There are reports that Obama never had a U.S. passport until he got a diplomatic passport in 2004. There were some speculations of his travels with his Indonesian passport until 2004."

***

I asked Taitz what her endgame is. What do she and the Birthers really want? The answer is the annulment not only of Obama's election but everything he's achieved while in the Oval Office.

"There are two precedents whereby two senators were removed from office specifically because of the issue of citizenship and residency," Taitz says. "They were removed from office and a special election was held, and as a matter of fact all of their actions were nullified. So that's why I've been demanding that the Congress address this issue immediately because any and all action, any and all executive orders or laws signed by Obama would be deemed null and void if it was found that he is not eligible for presidency.

"So those who are now spending time and money and will on health care reform, we need to address the issue of Obama's legitimacy and eligibility for presidency, first and foremost. Because if he's not eligible then we can't talk about health care, because if it's signed into law by Obama and he's not eligible then it's not binding. It's not real."

Yikes! She's coming to NYC on Tuesday. Should I try to meet her?

Category: HOT ITEMS!, Radio and Media Broadcasts
TV, RADIO, NEWS PAPER INTERVIEWS
Posted on | October 11, 2009 | No Comments

Tomorrow 8:30 am or 5:30 PST Rick Roberts syndicated show
I will fly to NY after that show

Tuesday 8:30 am taping with Russian television and Radio
10:30 intervies with Swedish channel 4 TV
12:00 interview for New Your Times magazine
2-2:30pm Steve Malzberg syndicated show
4-6 taping of a TV show (will provide more info on Tue)
6:00 National writers syndicat interview
8- was supposed to do Guardian UK, but the reporter Ed Pilkerton is flying to LA same time to interview Sygorney Weaver, which is probably for the best, since I think, one more interview and I will need an appointment with the urgent care unit at St. Vincent : - )
Orly