Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DNC Rips Politico Story Tying Polanski To Obama: “Silly,” “Amateur Hour”

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 04:50 PM
Original message
DNC Rips Politico Story Tying Polanski To Obama: “Silly,” “Amateur Hour”
politico-that figures.

http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/democratic-national-committee/dnc-rips-politico-story-tying-polanski-to-obama-silly-amateur-hour/


DNC Rips Politico Story Tying Polanski To Obama: “Silly,” “Amateur Hour”


In another sign of the Obama operation’s zeal for playing rough with the media, the Democratic National Committee is taking an unusually hard shot at Politico for posting a much-criticized story today linking Roman Polanski with Obama and the DNC.

“This story is just lowbrow, and it’s amateur hour,” DNC spokesman Brad Woodhouse told me. “It’s one of the silliest stories that I’ve ever seen.”

The story, titled “Roman Polanski backers Gave $34K To Barack Obama, DNC,” reported that Hollywood types urging Polanski’s release shelled out that amount to the DNC and to Obama’s presidential campaign. It took a beating in the blogosphere for concocting a link between Polanski and Dems that seemed almost comically tenuous.

I’d heard people at the DNC were mightily ticked by the story. When I checked in, Woodhouse uncorked an unusually harsh tirade — the sort the DNC normally reserves for unabashedly ideological right wing outlets.

“You could find a certain number of {our donors} who believe in Scientology,” Woodhouse fumed. “You could find a certain number who are even Redskins fans.”

“It’s a silly story that’s just meant to try to generate a sensational headline and a lot of clicks,” he continued. “It’s really unfortunate that it was written, period. But also, we were blindsided by it. They didn’t contact us. We raised $750 million, and they found that $34,000 of it that was raised by people who know Roman Polanski.”

“We will look for the political angle in virtually any story,” responded top Politico editor Jim VandeHei. “This short blog item was done for the Click page — where we run a lot of entertainment and personality items. It was quick item based on FEC data alone.”

The aggressive Dem response is another sign of the harder edge that Woodhouse has brought to the increasingly combative DNC. It’s also a reminder that the fractured new media landscape — and the multiplication of outlets the Obama operation has at its disposal to get its message out — has diluted the power of individual outlets and turned them into easier targets for aggressive pushback.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Do the Rethugs REALLY want to get into a pissing contest (if you'll pardon the expression)
Edited on Thu Oct-08-09 04:58 PM by rocktivity
about what criminals have given money to what candidates? They MUST know that they wouldn't win. And what's this crap about Obama "playing rough with the media"? Look at who's been playing rough with HIM!!!

:headbang:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Engineer4Obama Donating Member (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. But they're the media
Its okay when they do it. I mean its not like Obama was elected by the entire nation while the reporters were selected by giant corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't know. I heard a rumor that a teenage Obama was filming Polanski as he raped that
young girl. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Engineer4Obama Donating Member (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. He had to do something after the weathermen broke up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. They never really "broke up". They control the White House behind the
Edited on Thu Oct-08-09 05:00 PM by Guy Whitey Corngood
scenes from an underground bunker where Stalin's corpse is buried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-09-09 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Guys! Please!
Ixnay on the onspiracykay. It's still ecretsay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. The film is buried in a warehouse, next to the Ark of the Covenant and the "Whitey" tape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. The wording is still too civil. Try "desperate" and "nonsensical". n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
8. Redskins fans, lol
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. I am and I know many many others are loving this
Edited on Thu Oct-08-09 10:14 PM by Cha
agressiveness against the sleazy "media"'s sensationalized celebrity rag n00ze, from the White House.

Shame on Politico for scaping the bottom of the rag barrel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC