Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nuts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bodhi BloodWave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 06:09 PM
Original message
Nuts
Found this over on nativeborncitizen and it made me chuckle, not sure on its reliability(but it seems that Orly has made a comment on it(politijab has commented on it as well as atleast one poster on FR)

***

Von: “West, Roger (USACAC)” <Roger.West4@usdoj.gov>Karte anzeigen
An: Charles Lincoln <charles.lincoln@rocketmail.com>

——————————————————————————–
Nuts.

From: Charles Lincoln
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 11:11 AM
To: Dejute, David (USACAC); West, Roger (USACAC)
Subject: Dr. Taitz seeks stipulation re: Discovery.

Dear Messers DeJute & West:

Dr. Taitz has asked me to ask you whether you are willing to stipulate that, now that the Scheduling Order has been made final, rather than moot, that it is now time for us to begin discovery. We need to start sending out notices of deposition duces tecum to parties and subpoenas duces tecum to non-parties. The Judge specifically said that the Scheduling order would only be important if the case were going to go forward, and he seems to have spoken on this point.

Charles E. Lincoln, Research Associate & Law Clerk for Dr. Taitz, Esq., Attorney for the Plaintiffs.

***

If this is true, then the german heading leads me to believe West was alluding to this with his reply:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_McAuliffe#.22Nuts.22

In all cases worthy of a chuckle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bodhi BloodWave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. Update
While nativeborncitizen might just be having fun, here is an follow up email exchange(I'm somewhat inclined to believe its true tho)

***

Von: West, Roger (USACAC) (Roger.West4@usdoj.gov)
An: Charles Lincoln
Datum: Mittwoch, den 7. Oktober 2009, 12:17:38 Uhr
Betreff: RE: Dr. Taitz seeks stipulation re: Discovery.

You are obviously not a student of military history. Because you appear confused, let me be clear. Per Judge Carter’s order, discovery is stayed in this case. We will not agree to any discovery in this case at this time.

From: Charles Lincoln
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 12:11 PM
To: West, Roger (USACAC)
Cc: Dr. Orly Taitz
Subject: AW: Dr. Taitz seeks stipulation re: Discovery.

Dear Mr. West:

Unless you can provide us with a more thoughtful answer and analysis of the situation, or can you ask Mr. DeJute to do so, We will report your Laconic response below to Judge Carter as the full and final statement of the United States’ well-considered position in this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatGund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. Let's put it this way.....
Dr. Orly and her "law clerk", disbarred felon Charles Lincoln III, filed those emails as "evidence" in the motion to dismiss discovery today.

Real or not, they're in the court record now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueMTexpat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Taitz and Lincoln are gifts that just keep giving.
Unfortunately, the court system has to keep dealing with them until the CA Bar does something about Taitz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC