Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama rings Finance Dems

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 03:41 PM
Original message
Obama rings Finance Dems
President Barack Obama has been dialing up Finance Committee senators in a bid to move health care reform to the next step.

Sen. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) just got pulled away from a scrum of reporters, who were marveling at his fluffy white dog Dakota, to take a phone call from the president.

Obama called Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J) within the last hour. Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-W.V.) got a call Wednesday. He weighed in last week with Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.).

"There was not anything specific, he didn't ask for anything specific, just you know we hope you continue to make progress, hope we have a bill, it is really important the American people," Menendez said.

Menendez said he did not commit to vote for the bill. One of the senator's chief concerns is making the cost of insurance more affordable, and the committee has yet to take up amendments dealing with that issue.

http://www.politico.com/livepulse/1009/Obama_rings_Finance_Dems.html?showall
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wait, why isn't Obama twisting their arms like Rahm tried to do w/ Trumka?
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. And no, Trumka will not disclose what was said
Edited on Thu Oct-01-09 03:52 PM by truedelphi
As it was PRIVATE.

So there goes all the juicy transparency that President Obama promised us.

Dick Cheney met in secrecy to draw up an energy plan, and now Obama officials are protected by "Privacy" for their engineering the Health Insurance Plan.

Well, at least we got stem cell research as promised. (Trying to think of any other SIGNIFICANT promises that have been kept in a significant manner.)

Of course, without health insurance reform that is meaningful, stem cells will not mean much to most of us. That will go to those who have the Boutique Health Insurance plans.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. The contents of every conversation people have needs to be made public?
let's be realistic for a minute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I don't think there is a need to ask for privacy to shield
Edited on Thu Oct-01-09 04:02 PM by truedelphi
The overall contents of what is said between two important officials regarding a major policy matter.

I am not saying we need every word, but yes, details matter, and should be released.

It is our friggin' government and they are OUR friggin' public SERVANTS. Though few of them seem aware of that any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I'm thinking about times that I've been in meetings and floated a potentially unpopular idea
just to put all of our options on the table. Trial balloons can be useful so that we can flesh out the idea to see if it makes sense or not.

Now, take that and put it in the newspapers and it could become a major story.

I can think of dozens of scenarios where the details of a private conversation wouldn't be productive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. No one is asking for every single word.
Just what major points were made (if any)

I too have attended many meetings in my lifetime. I understand that sometimes you don't want sunshine on everything.

But the whole meeting should not be allowed PRIVACY. Surely there is some glimmer of something that need sot be offered up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. That quite likely
is the dumbest reply to an OP I've seen today. Congratulations there have been a shitload of dumb replies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Oh, sorry you don't get to know everything at the moment
it's talked about. And, PO is out there doing the work inspite of all the sniping and sniffing on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Here's one thing we know:
Edited on Fri Oct-02-09 02:05 PM by truedelphi
The Health Insurance (Murderering-Lying) Corporate Interrests conducted a very successful PR campaign on the President back in May.

Acccording to Mother Jones:

In a letter to Obama that was released over the weekend, executives from the Advanced Medical Technology Association (the medical device manufacturers lobbying group), the American Hospital Association, the American Medical Association, America’s Health Insurance Plans, and the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, as well as the Service Employees International Union, pledged to “do our part” to reduce health care costs. Their vague, pie-in-the sky promise amounts to just a 1.5 percent reduction in the growth rate of health care spending. Such is the explosion in health care costs that even this miniscule reduction represents a potential $2 trillion saving over 10 years. But there’s no guarantee this figure will be achieved. As the Washington Post points out:

The groups did not spell out yesterday how they plan to reach such a target, and…they offer only a broad pledge, not an outright commitment….

In addition, White House officials said, there is no mechanism to ensure that the groups live up to their offer, only the implicit threat of public embarrassment.


“Public embarrassment”? From Big Pharma and the health insurance companies–-two of the most shameless industries in the history of corporate capitalism?


An FDR were have told these bastards to put it where the sun won't shine. Though his language is much more elegant than I susggest - For instance, he was known to say, "Better to deal with the families behind organized crime than to deal with the organized bankers." (And insurance "providers" can be lumped in to the class of banking families without it being too much of a stretch.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Do you have a link for that or are you just
passing extremist gossip?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Why don't you just try googling Rahm and Trumka
Edited on Fri Oct-02-09 02:07 PM by truedelphi
And then choose from whether you want the Reuters, AP or other versions.

It's pretty easy to do.

And all the stories say pretty much the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. You can tell by the color of Kent's ears that Raum was on line first ... then the Pres
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. yeah, it is REALLY IMPORTANT THAT the Powers that Be
Edited on Thu Oct-01-09 03:46 PM by truedelphi
Continue to screw the American People.

Go Obama!


Don't stop dialing that phone, you might lose a campaign contributer or two!




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Sorry..why are you so paranoid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
budkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. You obviously haven't been paying attention
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Obama needs to do more than just call them up.
He needs to "reach out and touch" a few of them with a slap to the face for protecting the insurance companies, and forsaking their constituents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarjorieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-01-09 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. Moving it along to conference, and he doesn't have to divulge every conversation as if it were over
the Public Address system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
budkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
17. Obama is aiding those clowns when he should be busting their asses!
Makes me fucking sick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC